/biz/ - Business & Finance

I make $600 a day

>>15185384
Can't prove you wrong. It's true. Every. Single. Time.

>>14715457

>>13306047

>>13226605

>>13102907

It connects the lightning to the network, obviously.

>>12532096
I do, but only ironically unironically

I was burdened by grief last year. It was the same shit that's been on my mind since 2011. Some of it was even older. It goes back to 1999. What you do, did, didn't, and could have done combine to a heavy stone. But the years turning made me look back, and it's been so long, that stone got throw on the wayside when I didn't notice.

It's been 8 year since I had any contact with the love of my life.
It's been 19 years since I last visited my stomping grounds.
I haven't talked to my parents in so long. Are they even alive? Do they even think about me?
I used to have siblings, but I've not seen them for so long. I used to do all sorts of creative things, but that was years ago. Now I have a job, I need to travel, I have people to order around, and things to manage.

The grief I used to carry's gone now, somehow. I didn't change anything, or do things differently. It's hard to care about things in general for me, but now it seems impossible. Once upon a time, I was a romantic, and when I said something, you know I meant it. Now, I say nothing, and there's no meaning hidden behind either my words or my actions. I count my money, I pay my bills, I catch a plane, I book in, I leave. The magic's gone, and I'm not even old. Imagine living a life where you're not still sad about the failure that was your highschool sweetheart. Imagine having all the money and connections, but having lost your link to humanity.

THOR

just b urself

>>12001824
>When you say something needs an IQ of 150 to see its logical structure, you're implying its an expression of intelligence. You can flip that statement and give it a negative definition instead >intellegince to NOT misunderstand it but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right

I was differentiating between the claim that "what he said requires 150 IQ to say" and "what he said requires 150 IQ to understand". You said I said the former in a previous post, which I did not. I technically didn't even say the latter but I won't split hairs on that and will just let that stand as a perceived statement in your mind because the meaning of what I said is approximate enough anyway.

>but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right.
You just misunderstood because you're not reading literally.

Note: I'm not saying he is sub-150iq just because I say I didn't say he is 150iq+ due to the statement he made.

>obviously he spoke without adequately anticipating how a others would perceive what he wrote... and thats the same thing that happens when someone makes a stupid move. It doesn't really need any rationalization
Well yes. A question for you: Are otherwise extremely intelligent people not extremely intelligent if they have a cognitive blindspot / lacking that makes them perform even worse than the average person in a specific type of task?

>>12001824
>When you say something needs an IQ of 150 to see its logical structure, you're implying its an expression of intelligence. You can flip that statement and give it a negative definition instead >intellegince to NOT misunderstand it
but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right

I was differentiating between the claim that "what he said requires 150 IQ to say" and "what he said requires 150 IQ to understand". You said I said the former in a previous post, which I did not. I technically didn't even say the latter but I won't split hairs on that and will just let that stand as a perceived statement in your mind because the meaning of what I said is approximate enough anyway.

>but thats just shifting the goal posts to keep you in the right.
You just misunderstood because you're not reading literally.

Note: I'm not saying he is sub-150iq just because I say I didn't say he is 150iq+ due to the statement he made.

>bviously he spoke without adequately anticipating how a others would perceive what he wrote... and thats the same thing that happens when someone makes a stupid move. It doesn't really need any rationalization
Well yes. A question for you: Are otherwise extremely intelligent people not extremely intelligent if they have a cognitive blindspot / lacking that makes them perform even worse than the average person in a specific type of task?

>>11880892

Read some books while you wait for the dump of all dumps to finish.

>>11787239
Have you considered self publishing on Amazon?

>End of 2018
>There are still people that don't think all cryptos are scams and ponzi schemes

buttcoin

>>8579449
>chink design that comprises the function of a desk
one spill and your rig is fried.
kill yourself now to spare the embarrassment

>implying ANYBODY is going to buy your zcl bags after the snapshot
>implying there is a single person who isn't intended to 'dump on those noobs'
>implying buttcorn private will be worth anything
>implying there was ever any "free money" for you
>implying youtube shills were shilling to enrich YOU and not themselves

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA HAH HAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAH HAHHAHAHHAHAHAHA A HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAHHAHAHHAHAHA

if by mars, you mean "down to 5000", then yeah

check em

Well, /biz/?