[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2022-05-12: Maintenance has concluded successfully. 2022-05-12: Ghost posting is now globally disabled.
2022: Due to resource constraints, /g/ and /tg/ will no longer be archived or available. Other archivers continue to archive these boards.Become a Patron!

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   
View page     

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
>> No.25288603 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
25288603

>>25288458
>google
Google announced first, pic related.

>>25288458
>>25285871
>the stats are real
No they're not.

>only 106 nodes in a private KYC network
It's not a "private network", they're private contracts.
Contracts will always be private, they are whatever the client/contract operator want them to be.

>out of those, 83 have ran 0 jobs (!)
You have no idea what "jobs" means.
The nodes are ALL providing oracle inputs at every single interval (barring some catastrophic temporary event).
Which is their only task.

>only 255 data feed available after years of development
>99% are all price feeds
And they provide the back-end for many billions of USD in Defi.

>out of those, only 10% have been used in the last hour, 90% of which were just a bulk update across
You have no idea how many times users (Aave, Synthetix, ...) are using the feeds lmao. Only they can know.

>Do you think a coin with these metrics after 2 years on mainnet should be in top 10 with a 13 billion dollar valuation
Valuation isn't about the current state of things, it's about future potential.

>> No.25123171 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
25123171

>>25122710
>Swift hasn't mentioned Chainlink in 3 years.
And?

>Sergey lied on the website claiming it's a partnership.
No he didn't.
Swift paid Sergey to complete a PoC for them and present it at Sibos.

>Several Google employees have confirmed there is no partnership
Google announced first, pic related.

>> No.25086910 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
25086910

>>25086844
Here's the announcement made by Google before Chainlink retweeted.

>> No.23526023 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
23526023

>>23523517
>>23523574
Still seething to this very day

>> No.18625315 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18625315

>>18625257
Yeah, how dare Google run around faking a partnership with Chainlink.

>> No.18574151 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18574151

>>18574080
If it's fake, then why did Google Cloud announce this first?

>> No.18571899 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18571899

>>18571135
>All these fake partnerships are marketing.
Then explain how these "fake partnerships" are first announced by the partner, and not Chainlink.

>> No.18538018 [View]
File: 156 KB, 607x695, google cloud bigquery chainlink original tweet.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
18538018

>>18537661
>lies about partnerships

I'll never understand why people even try to claim this.
Chainlink never announces a partnership first.
Like pic related.



Navigation
View posts [+24] [+48] [+96]