/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>19161841
So what? The ledger operates with people using Segwit, making the whole thing fake and gay (invalid).

>>16618799
>inability to pick up on context clues
Neat. Let me help you. You have to believe I'm paid to cope although your devs are actually owned by banking interests with no intention of scaling Bitcoin so it can't compete with credit cards which they shill relentlessly.

>>16618824
>it's a soft fork so it's not a change in protocol because its soft

Okay, retard.

>>16541255
Yes

>>16266982
Segwit broke consensus and I can't wait to see you make the argument about hash once SV is the dominate chain.

>>16267001
Pruning doesn't alter UTXO sets. If it did it wouldn't have been allowed in the first place.

>>14410543
Softfork is a misnomer. Just because its "optional" doesn't mean Segwit transactions aren't FOREVER locked into BTC's ledger. Here's some nChain propaganda I know you've never seen before. It explains how coins are a chain of digital signatures.

>>14410571
>cypherpunks
I don't need the cringepunks. By all means though go ahead.

>>14145243
If you take transactions off of the blockchain find another technology to facilitate your needs because obviously you've missed the entire point of blockchain.

>>14145266
It removes pic related from Bitcoin.

>>13559294
Here's what they say it is at Nchain.