/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>20788552
okay you intellectually bankrupt fucking peameal-brained mote of covid-infested ant piss—you want a baseless assumption? how about "guarantee a large entity an income at the expense of a population and they will produce adequate goods and services at a low cost for that population no matter what!"? what about "rationality completely falters to a single set of statistics produced by a group that may or may not have a vested interest in forcing a population to pay up more than half of their annual earnings towards inferior medicine!" what about "doctors are perfectly moral and only ever do good things for people, and thus cannot act in such a way that they benefit at the expense of someone else!"
like, you share a fucking press piece with me as if it PROVES your """""""""argument""""""""" (READ: *ACTUAL* OPINION NOT BACKED UP BY ANY RATIONAL ARGUMENT) that having a middleman that you're forced to pay JUST MAGICALLY makes a good or a service cheaper.
you can't argue for fuck-all, and if you can, i've yet to see it.

do you have any idea the kind of medicines there are that nobody can legally market as medicines, or use in a clinical setting STRICTLY because of gov't intervention? emeramide? BPC-157? GHK-Cu? epitalon? LSD and psilocybin? do you understand how many people have lived lives of misery because of gov't regulations that have, for DECADES, prevented legal access to an entire market of medicines that far more cheaply and effectively deal with common and uncommon issues? like, holy fuck—YOU arguing with ME about this is like some insanely entitled, CLUELESS TWAT on a college campus trying to tell an ex-citizen of a communist regime just how GREAT communism is.
we all get what we deserve—you included, you miserable prick. if we all got what we earned, you'd either be dead, or a different person.

>>20789028
>stats
A FUCKING PRESS PIECE. YOU SHARED A FUCKING PRESS PIECE WITH WORDS AND NUMBERS AND YOU THINK THIS IS STATS.
FUCK YOU FOR WASTING MY TIME.