[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.25087068 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
25087068

>>25087033
>Random Google employee with access to GCPcloud twitter account

lel he must've barricaded himself real good in the office with the Twitter terminal, he kept at it for months.

>> No.24853834 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
24853834

>>24853682
>they've all been confirmed fraudulent
uh huh

>> No.23156473 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
23156473

>>23156411
>>23156444
t. still can't cope

>> No.22157783 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
22157783

>>22157733
>no token required
If you want to run your node for free, be anyone's guest.

>Every partnership rumour turned out false
Yeah, how deceptive of Chainlink to retweet Google Cloud's tweets about Chainlink.

>> No.21859701 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
21859701

>>21859255
>>21859286
>>21859585
Absolutely seething copetards.

>> No.19369229 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19369229

>>19369206
>1 obscure tweet from 1 obscure department
It was actually 3 public tweets from Google Cloud's main Twitter handle.
And the in-depth blog post, of course.

>> No.18977914 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, google-chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18977914

>>18973893
I just noticed that the Chainlink cube in that graphic looks exactly like the one Google used in their blog posts & featured graphics.

>> No.18616993 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18616993

>>18616956
>google partnership was false
Better tell Google that.

>> No.18602826 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18602826

>>18602691
Yeah, and even sadder is Google Cloud keeps repeating the fake partnership.

>> No.18538781 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18538781

>>18538742
>Because it's been 1-2 years and literally all the "partnerships" have been dead silent
Google Cloud just repped Chainlink again four months ago.

Just because things aren't moving right away doesn't mean anything has been abandoned at all.
ETH still hasn't implemented PoS after 6 years, but they haven't abandoned it.

>> No.18204607 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18204607

>>18204558
You mean Link spammers like Google Cloud?

>> No.18145733 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18145733

>>18145721
Look at all this cope.

>> No.17463494 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17463494

>>17463463
Just cope.

>> No.17437471 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17437471

>>17437437
>Again, Sergey can’t even confirm on the record that Google is a partner.
Why would Sergey have to do that when Google announced it first?

>> No.17309126 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17309126

>>17309111
>some faggot at google
It's actually Google Cloud itself, not just some faggot.
Pic related.

Also, what about Oracle?

>> No.17021140 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17021140

>>17020407
>linkies are incapable of describing and providing sources for every single partnership
The partners themselves do that.

>> No.16765383 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16765383

>>16765354
>>"We contacted Chainlink and they neither confirmed nor denied that the company was an official Cloud Partner.

lmao

>> No.16688820 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16688820

>>16686542

>> No.16688755 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16688755

>>16688751
uh huh

>> No.16676577 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, 1577479015485.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16676577

>>16676567
dude are you even trying? lmao

>> No.16676045 [View]
File: 457 KB, 1954x746, tweets google cloud chainlink.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16676045

>>16675943
cope

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]