/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26376321
习近平皇帝万岁

>>17512523
Ya, people like to be anti-establishment, which I completely get, and I do agree with the argument that Google does have a lot of control over web standards as far as protocols go, but it can be argued that they have streamlined a lot of processes that are needed going forward technology wise for a better internet. They have the largest aggregation of high level engineers so there's a lot of nuance to what they do, especially because chromium is FOSS, so while they do implement a lot of standards that benefit themselves it also benefits the rest of us, so its a mixed bag.

And as far as stagnation goes I don't know that if it will last the whole decade but that wouldn't be a complete surprise if it did. I'm sure in that time we'll see a lot of projects go bust and only those with outside funding will survive. I know a lot of crypto purists hate that but that's just reality. Brave Software is only one of the few projects in this space that is funded with US dollars from venture capitalists, which for better or worse defines a companies viability these days. We don't know what the future holds as far as crypto regulation is concerned either but Brave has taken all the right steps with BAT to ensure that they've been compliant thus far, so the token has viability with respect to that. Ultimately its funny that one of the major fud points against BAT is that even if it pumps it will "only" do a 10x, which highlights the fact that crypto holders have been far too greedy from past returns and aren't willing to adjust expectations. If you DCA into BAT over the next 3 years even at an extremely conservative pace the returns that could be had will still be astronomical, all it takes is patience. But I guess we'll see.