/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>52473242
>>52473254
>>52473257
Thanks for answering my question

>>51044685
ouu spicy
i bet youre chadshill in disguise
your roided up brain must think your small penis shame can be overriden by buying GME but still shitting on your fellow HODLers because you think you're better than them
still christ as you're not a true shill after all; just diverting attention from the real ones!

lol, lmao

WAGMI nigga

>>49522511
Speaking of opening the market, how do you think Russian stocks will start trading again? So many cheapies unavailable to buy.

>>28813126
You are right, we are in a bubble. Now what? Right before the End of a bubble always has the most gains, and with all the positive economic news why do you think it will pop this year or next.

We know in the next three years things are going to get very ugly. Still, what does that mean I should being doing today besides trying to make as much as possible so a halfining hurts less.

Chainlink is basically smooth sailing to fresh and light pussy with just a bit of attitude. The global conquest of pussy began with LINK (ticker: LINK) and it ends with colonization.

Link holders are absolutely delusional.

Link is the perfect normie coin. It's got a cool logo, it's $20/coin, and "muh oracles" is just technically sophisticated enough for normies to understand but too sophisticated for normies to dive deep enough to realize Link just isn't needed.

If smart contracts actually start being used in the real world (no, making ERC-20 scamcoins doesn't count) then some will require Oracles. But an Oracle is just a JSON parser with some voting mechanisms baked in. It's not something you need BILLIONS of dollars and YEARS to develop. It's not something you need "partnerships" for. You sit down, write the code, and you're done. Chainlink isn't in the Oracle business. They're a branding machine. Their sole objective is pumping the price of their asset, Link. An asset, by the way, they own 60% of. Yes, 60%.

When the time comes Oracles will be written on the native platform (probably Ethereum) and they'll use the native token (Ether). No one is going to need Link, no one is going to buy Link. Nobody will care. This project, along with all the other fad-projects will fade into obscurity. I won't speculate on price, this entire market is an irrational frenzy. Perhaps there is still room to grow, more money to be made. Just know you stand on 0 fundamentals and in the end fundamentals will prevail.

>>26392216
if everyone expects it to happen, it's probably not going to happen. I don't own any Tesla, but even I can see this shit isn't falling anytime soon.

>>26382892
When should I sell SRAC?

>>26184037
BBBBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOBBBBBBBBBAAAAAAA

>>26151155
Just learned about ARKK, do you think it still has steam or has it already popped?

>>26131461
Biased but trueish. Farmed has much more omega 3 then wild (though competitively shit on the 3 to 6 ratio still way ahead of normal food or the average diet), I dispute the toxins outright, one piece of misinformation. Way better for the enviroment and again even with the shit ratio better for people to eat then anything else but wild salmon. Most exciting part is this eat the bug memes. The bugs aren’t for us, they are for the fish farms, and they change the farmed to healthier then wild when done right. I hear you, but know this Frankenstein fish CAN be done right.

>>26126061
Fuck, I experimented with instead of donating to charity Id buy these kind of stocks with 10% of my bonuses. Bought Tesla, some Florida green energy company, and a pharmacy company that doesn’t patent there drugs for Africa. Sold them all for a sweet, 80% return on BABA. The drug company is up 40%, other two up 300-800% in 3 years. Not the worst investment strategy.

>>26082463
Problem with baba is I can see it growing more then 33% this year. But it’s definitely one of the few ones you can count on to perform.

>>26075018
I'm anti-coom, but I must admit that you are a blessed poster.

>Not Angie but I still good

How do I get a woman like this to sleep with me?