/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>24426081
and they all proceeded to panic sell once MMs or whoever the fuck it is started manipulating the ticker downwards as usual

oh well i guess this just can't be a meme stock rally with how deep the short sellers are in it

>>23397992
always thought it was over-exaggerated by people who were rationalizing their poor decisions

>>23319293
you should never never do a market buy especially in a pick that's so blatantly manipulated

>>23056990
they're probably averaging down (or up depending on you see it). Considering the manipulation going on, they're probably covering at manipulatively low prices and shorting the top everyday

pic related, ticker tricks where they can keep prices low even though there are more orders to buy

>>23017919
>but if it takes a significant dip get out
that's the problem though, he is right that TA is self-fulfilling bullshit, and it's exactly what short sellers want and expect you to do because it's predictable which is why they aren't covering yet.
if you're going to dip out, do it because something has fundamentally changed or the speculation aspect is gone (Cohen dipping out). It's really retarded to base your strategies on TA when it should be very fucking clear since last week the price manipulation that is going on with GME right now, even the dip yesterday was well below average volume

the short squeeze play by November is over. This is now primarily a deep value play because that's the only way short sellers will be convinced to start covering, if people are actually longing GME and Q3 or Q4 are actually decent

>>22849552
LEAPs yes, weeklies no
did you see how hard """they""" were trying to pin down GME under $10 on Friday?

>>22840266
>I just want to steer newbies away from weeklies.
those retards are hopeless.
it's smarter to just buy shares on leverage (or LEAPs) at this point especially with the IV.
fucking hilarious yesterday how GME was being pinned down under $10. Orders with asking prices lower than the fucking bids, some guy on stocktwits posted pic related, what is that nonsense

use to think that ""market manipulation"" was just some garbage cope that delusional stocktwit bagholders spout, but it seems to be very apparent here, never mind the blatant naked short selling with the Sept 15 data, we've known for a while that there are more shares owned by institution that there are outstanding shares precisely because of that short selling.
Like how the fact does Gamestop even fix this issue because it's going to be a nightmare for shareholder votes.

>>22817591
>in attempt to boost price higher.
you were actually suppose to limit buy you fool