/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>13071288

Also this.

That's why modern trust fund kids are mostly communists and raging Antifa faggots. Because they've been given everything, they have no perception of value or the work it takes to build wealth.

You should just commit suicide, like most of the tormented kids of millionaires.

>>12939103
>It's all about the halving,

Not a chance.

It's about stupid retail investor normies stampeding in with their dumb money and being the greater fools to dump.

ALWAYS, ALWAYS.


You're a total novice if you don't realize this.

>>9660862

Since they made the announcement of the partnership weeks ago, they have not held a single conversation with Wikimedia about technical implementation.

Wikimedia got pissed off they were being using for nothing but bullshit marketing and decided to dump the deadbeats.

Well done Wikimedia.

I've been meaning to ask a dedicated miner about Decred.

One of my Norman co-workers seems to think he's smarter than everyone in the market, and recently got some Chink clone of an S-9 ASIC miner tailored for Decred.

He claims he can make like $1500 a week running this thing.

Makes no sense, because if this were that profitable, I'd imagine every major pool and Genesis mining piling in and mining the shit out of it.

Is this a load of shit or what?

>>9577295

You will literally experience the heat death of the known universe before the burn mechanism has any appreciable impact on the circulating supply.

Like, are you literally retarded and can't do basic arithmetic?

>>9423344

Oh look, a real life Digimarine.

Hey there little fella... :3 I thought you all suicided by now?

>>9336000

Hey OP.

Am I missing out much on the disposable corporate wage cuck corporate career experience?

>>9188498

Guys, I'm aiming for 30 cents by 2025.

Am I being too optimistic?

>>8964289

Well I'm currently sitting on 325% profit in REQ since I bought in at 4 cents.

I've already made a respectable gain.

Would you recommend I bail out and seek out higher volume shitcoins?

>>8875465
>team is too large and dedicated to be a retail scam.

Not an outright scam, but it appears in late 2017, the ICO thing was already rigged against retail buyers, with only big, shadowy investors and whales doing pre-public ICO deals, making away with ridiculous profits.

Without devolving into Wojaks and memes, is anyone aware of any legitimate, fundamental reason why the crypto market has tapered by this much?

There doesn't seem to be a single, fundamentals driven factor doing this, that I'm aware of.

I know the Winkelvoss people sold approx. several thousand tokens, but with the daily volumes that we see, that's not even a drop in the bucket to move prices.

Any thoughts?

>>6644862

This is one dumb fucking ICO.

>Hurr, speculate on a speculation by buying our speculative project

This whole fucking ICO business needs to come crashing fucking down in flames for people to smell the flowers.

>>6536578

>Mentions ENG

You have no credibility.

And you've got the balls to call REQ vaporware? Pajeet, please.

Have you even read the ENG whitepaper? Can you even articulate what is they are even doing?

>>6532943

>Going to put a down payment on a 2 million dollar 24 unit apartment complex fully loaded already with tenants.

Why not just buy a residential REIT and get a professional management team to deal with the properties, rents, repairs, evictions etc?

Sure you pay a fee to the management team, but they do provide a value.

How much are you putting down?

>>5809476
>>5809485

Can you actually address the concern. I'm not FUD, I own 10K LINK, but how exactly do you expect one man with no formal education on software engineering to pull this off? Do you have evidence he's hired professionals?

>>5809509
Is LINK the only Oracle solution?

>>5309729

Volume is building nicely for tomorrow's big announcement (I suspect it will dwarf Colossus, the team would not release that and then have nothing for Friday).

I'm hoping it's a listing on GDAX or something to give us some REAL volume.

Anyway, we're at nearly 900 BTC volume in REQ/BTC right now, and with BTC falling and REQ rising, this is a great way to multiply your BTC stack because it will rebound, naturally. BCASH is a fucking manipulated pump and dump, just like XRP BTW.

>>5261532

The extreme swings and volatility of BCH make it look equivalent to some of the most bottom feeding shitcoins that populate the bottom of Coinmarketcap pages. They have no credibility.

Satoshis vision is Monero, anway.

>>5220602

Smart REQ holders were getting REQt and mocked throughout October and November. Now we're sitting at 500% gain, and confident of further growth since the team has proven reliable, hard working and professional. We already have more than OMG and at a fraction of the market cap.

>>4965228

It's not like it's currently sitting at 320% since 2 weeks ago with a volume and activity that saw it weather one of the most severe BTC pullbacks while not even flinching when all of the other shitcoins were bleeding etc. etc. ad nauseum.

Take your skateboard, and shove it where the Sun don't shine.

>>4848424

End of 2018, we'll have a working test net. Once this goes live and the normies see the software and interface, this thing will demolish OMG and eat their market share.

I'd expect $0.50 at the very least, might even see it this Friday.

>>4816269

Fuck. We got some pretty big bois here.

What's your strategy?

I don't want to get dumped on this Friday if you plan to exit early.

>>4652128

I'm up 57% on it.

What are you idiots doing wrong?

>>4026061

These two are already over-exposed and highly over-valued.

Much better 10x potential in gems like XAS, REQ or even LINK.