/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12090009
He is a monumentally idiotic person. The very definition of a Dunning-Kruger NPC. Watching him break down in tears and renounce BTC maximalism was almost worth the BTC situation, he's that loathesome.

>>12027041
Yep. That's a cultist. The feeling is very much mutual.

>>12011689

>>12008943
>>12009478
>>12009504
>>12009517

Digital Currency Group's "portfolio" includes:

ShapeShift
Ripple
Kraken
Etherscan
Circle
CoinDesk
Coinbase
Bitwala
Purse.io

Just to name a few. Everything here: https://dcg.co/portfolio/

>Something to note about Kraken and Shapeshift and Purse:

Kraken's DCG involvement is why Kraken is anti-SV and pro-ABC. Not because Roger Ver invested in them, it's mainly because of DCG, they were "instructed" to be anti-SV. And Shapeshift now require registration with a full KYC procedure. Purse is pro-ABC and anti-SV (Roger shills it).

>>12008943
>>12009478
>>12009504
>>12009517

Digital Currency Group's "portfolio" includes:

ShapeShift
Ripple
Kraken
Etherscan
Circle
CoinDesk
Coinbase
Bitwala
Purse.io

Just to name a few.

>Something to note about Kraken and Shapeshift and Purse:

Kraken's DGC involvement is why Kraken is anti-SV and pro-ABC. Not because Roger Ver invested in them, it's mainly because of DGC, they were "instructed" to be anti-SV. And Shapeshift now require registration with a full KYC procedure. Purse is pro-ABC and anti-SV (Roger shills it).

>>11989011
If it's off-chain, it's not Bitcoin.

>>11945466
> don't get either, get the kiked one instead

>>11930817
Useless triplenigger

>>11921274
Like a fucking transmission variable that isn't related to total throughput and doesn't force all traffic through alternative layers is equivalent to a block size limit which was supposed to be temporary and does exactly that. Christ you're a fucking retard baka.
And if you love CSW so much, why don't you follow him? He's a useless fucking fraudulent know nothing nigger just like you, you'd be in good company.
Every time you fuckheads open your mouth I am just stunned by the level of stupidity you exhibit. You think you can fucking argue with and debate empirical reality and the facts on the ground about the territory in question, you fucking cannot. Everybody knows the story behind the sabotage of BTC was bullshit, it's been proven in both test and production, you can bitch to the contrary all you like, but the figures are right there for anybody with half a brain to understand them and your political subterfuge serves only to move more niggers into your useless fucking containment camp.

>>11895345
well you certainly are a fag.

>>11886795
BS
Did I mean bullshit or blockstream?
Same thing.

>>11887051
BASED and Satoshi-pilled!

>>11885709

>>11882079

>>11879213
What's the deal? It's Bitcoin. Previously, BCH was Bitcoin. Before that, BTC was Bitcoin (before Blockstream). If you want Bitcoin, then SV is your only option today.

Read this: https://coingeek.com/bitcoin-ceases-bitcoin-2nd-death/

>>11877996
>SV has ALL the resources and is the only credible threat to BTC

In other words, SV is the only threat to the Establishment, to (((the powers that be))). And why is it a threat?

>>11874405
No, they will play their games on BTC too. But credulous fools will think they're clever and have avoided them, because they don't actually understand cryptocurrency.

>>11871140

>>11865483
> I would rather support a project led by a well funded team of core developers
incompetents. And funded for what? You might want to ask yourself what the goal they're aiming for is, because it absolutely sure as fuck is not supply tamper proof uncensorable peer to peer electronic cash. And given that, you had better be sure you understand where what they *are* aiming at will end up.
> than believing anything that complete maniacs, idiots and frauds in the likes of Roger Ver or Craig Wright say or do.
Believe's got nothing to do with it. They're either wrong or they're right. And Ver at least is right when he correct identifies BTC as sabotaged.
Wright is indeed a useless fraudulent psychopath conman.
> I tend to believe that I know at the very least as much as you do about this subject.
Since you can't see the economic ends of the two paths in question, clearly that's wrong.

>>11865638
it's so sad that people think simply pursuing the original bitcoin vision is "shilling". Those core shills sure work hard.

>>11862790
It's true. Look up segwit2x NYA vs segwit signalling. The blockstream plan was firmly rejected by hashpower and forced through by the exchanges. The hashpower fell in line afterward because it was either that or go bankrupt. They did make a chain with what they viewed as the correct path though and that's bch. Look up uahf. You won't because you're a coretard fuckwit, but for anyone who reads this and cares about the truth everything I just said is verifiable true in the historical record.

>>11855542