/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>26578554
fuck off idiot, i'm knee deep in crypto, i just don't appreciate all these faggots polluting my board like it's some jersey waste dump. it's cleary paid for, it's cleary annoying and it's a stupid, useless product. fucking retard.

grats on the gain you filthy kike, now gtfo

>>22925426
पहले एयरड्रॉप्स बिज़ पर होते थे, सेर्गे ने उन्हें कॉपी किया और अपने सहकर्मियों को बोर्ड पर बिठाया, प्रमोटरों का भुगतान किया, फिर बिज़ पर लोगों से संपर्क किया ताकि प्रमोशन, इनसाइडर ट्रेडिंग, घोटाला हो सके first airdrops took place on biz, sergay copied them and got his coworkers on board, paid promoters, then contacted people on biz to promote, insider trading, scam आपूर्ति का 65%, किसी भी समय डंप कर सकता है, Google ब्लॉगपोस्ट (इनसाइडर ट्रेडिंग) कॉइनबेस लिस्टिंग और पंप का कारण बना 65% of supply, can dump at any time, टोकन पर कोई विकास नहीं, संभव नहीं, eip170, इथेरियम में कॉल (अनुबंध करने के लिए अनुबंध) मुश्किल है, केवल एशियाई पैसे पर चल रही मार्केटिंग google blogpost (insider trading) caused coinbase listing and pump no development on token, not possible, eip170, calls (contract to contract) in ethereum are difficult, only marketing going on for asian money

Reasons why Link will fail

1. Zero customers, zero need. No one is going to pay for information to be inserted into a smart contract. That's what an oracle is supposed to do. The problem is a x100 calls costs a x100 times whatever Link charges. If you have to make thousands of calls, that's hundreds of dollars in Link tokens. If I were a dev, it would be much simpler to just make my own call to whatever data I needed.

2. Zero development, all marketing. Link has hired shills, link started on biz and Sergey himself got the inspiration to post, network with and contact people on biz. That's why begging is not allowed on biz, because after link a lot of other tokens tried to copy them. There's a lot of disingenuous shills saying that Link was only made for business cases and biz was never supposed to discover it. Quite the opposite, it was made first as a marketing token.

3. Deceitful. The Link team lies continuously; they'll attend a conference (SIBOS) and say they're partnered with Swift which is a banking protocol that handles these bank conferences, implying that they're going to handle data for big banks. They contacted the Google dev to make an offical blogpost and thus said that they're "partnered" when in fact, it's just a mention. They stretch the truth.

4. Zero transparency. Link raised 32 million in it's ICO. Since then, we have no accounting of their funds. They market dumped twenty to thirty million worth of chainlink (we still don't know the full amount) and never said a word about it. They're still dumping here and there, even larger amounts and believe they are free to do so at any time.

5. Cult-like behavior. 90% of the memes made by Chainlink pose Sergey as this kind of messiah. They encourage zero compromise grounds that anyone should sell their token. They encourage people to buy their tokens despite; mortgages, spousal issues and even when their "investors" are homeless they'll encourage people to buy more.

>>19543164
>>LINK shills may be autistic, but they're organic and grew from within this place.

No, they're not. They're paid for Indians, just like the BSV. Then legit anons on here starting shilling it because they fell for the kool-aid.

>started here

Not really. Sergey browsed here and started fudding other tokens and promoting his own, going so far as to lie and make up bullshit. He is and was a fraud to the core promoting his hyperwave sonic boom-boom bullshit token to the NEETs here and they fell for it hook, line and sinker.

The only difference is that CSW might actually have Satoshi's keys, if he tries to bruteforce enough wallets there might be a one in one hundred trillion billion chance he gets it. Whereas even if sergey in even smaller odds creates "muh decentralized oracle network" it still will and won't be worth shit, because tl:dr; no fucking use cases, ever.

>>16766397

>>just believe
>>trust me the source
>>weird esoteric shit that has nothing to do with tech
>>trust me it'll take off
>>it'll moon anytime
>>it'll be worth 42,000,000 per link easily
>>billions on billions marketcap, zero risk goy!
>>overthrowing jews and globalism
>>muh cope
>>muh hiring team
>>muh partnerships
>>muh dderivatives
>>muh radio silence means it's coming, next month!
>>muh, muh, muh

all we ever hear from you faggots

>>an army of shills, two years of insane marketing could only barely x10 a scam
>>now that the clouds are closing, sir gay is exit scamming

SIRGAY FOR PRISON 2020!

Reasons why Link will fail

1. Zero customers, zero need. No one is going to pay for information to be inserted into a smart contract. That's what an oracle is supposed to do. The problem is a x100 calls costs a x100 times whatever Link charges. If you have to make thousands of calls, that's hundreds of dollars in Link tokens. If I were a dev, it would be much simpler to just make my own call to whatever data I needed.

2. Zero development, all marketing. Link has hired shills, link started on biz and Sergey himself got the inspiration to post, network with and contact people on biz. That's why begging is not allowed on biz, because after link a lot of other tokens tried to copy them. There's a lot of disingenuous shills saying that Link was only made for business cases and biz was never supposed to discover it. Quite the opposite, it was made first as a marketing token.

3. Deceitful. The Link team lies continuously; they'll attend a conference (SIBOS) and say they're partnered with Swift which is a banking protocol that handles these bank conferences, implying that they're going to handle data for big banks. They contacted the Google dev to make an offical blogpost and thus said that they're "partnered" when in fact, it's just a mention. They stretch the truth.

4. Zero transparency. Link raised 32 million in it's ICO. Since then, we have no accounting of their funds. They market dumped twenty to thirty million worth of chainlink (we still don't know the full amount) and never said a word about it. They're still dumping here and there, even larger amounts and believe they are free to do so at any time.

5. Cult-like behavior. 90% of the memes made by Chainlink pose Sergey as this kind of messiah. They encourage zero compromise grounds that anyone should sell their token. They encourage people to buy their tokens despite; mortgages, spousal issues and even when their "investors" are homeless they'll encourage people to buy more.

>>16352021

It's too early to dance on their graves. We need to ensure full legal repercussions happen to that fat walrus.

>>16000908
ALL LINKERS REPORT IN

LETS PUSH XRP OFF THIS BOARD, ZEC, 0XBTC, NYZO, FANTOM, STOCK MARKET, BCH, BRAP, ETH, SENT, VIDT, PI, BSV, IEXEC, RSR, HOLO, HARMONY, SILVER, GOLD, LTC, BITCOIN.

YOU SHOULD ONLY BE HOLDING CHAINLINK, PERIOD. ANYTHING ELSE IS HERESY!

BOW TO YOUR MASTER SERGEY! BE AGGRESSIVE. SHILL HARD. JOIN THE DISCORD AND LEARN THE SHILL TACTICS THERE. FUCK VITALIK. FUCK RIPPLE

BUY CHAINLINK ONLY. HODL CHAINLINK ONLY. BUY MORE CHAINLINK. BUY, BUY, BUY. HODL THE LINE.

YOU NAME IT, THIS IS OUR BOARD. FUCK YOU BITCOIN! FUCK YOU CORE KEKS! FUCK LTC! FUCK FANTOM! FUCK SILVER!

THIS SHOULD ONLY BE A CHAINLINK BOARD AND ONLY CHAINLINK DISCUSSION. CHANGE THE BOARD TO /CHAINLINK/

FUD EVERY THREAD, ATTACK EVERYONE, KEEP FIGHTING THE GOOD FIGHT. GET IN THEIR DISCORDS, TELEGRAMS, WEICHAT, WHATSUP AND FUD EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING ELSE.

EVERY POST MUST BE A CHAINLINK POST. DOX EVERYONE THAT DOESN'T POST ABOUT LINK. DON'T STOP. WE WILL BE THE NUMBER ONE COIN IN THE WORLD.

KEEP FUCKING BUYING DUDE

>>15844686

• It's already up 10x, and there is zero indication that anyone can get even a 2x going forward
• Sirgay goes to business meetings in a shirt that he only washes once every 3 (three) months, and never takes off, even when he goes to sleep; how can anyone take him seriously?
• Most Linklets have $500 or less "invested" in this shitcoin; nobody is going to "make it", and 99% of these so-called investors are absolute loser incels
• The "oracle problem" simply does not exist
• ChainLink will literally not exist in less than 5 years
• 630 + 70 = 700

>>15783696
Unironically sold these bags. Feels good to be off the plantation. The breadcrumbs, the "connections", this bullshit token will make you insanely bullish. Until you see Sergey stuttering through the same old talk, in some company breakroom, to 8 bored guys. No one stops and wonders - "if this is the 4th industrial revolution soon to be adopted by the global banking cartels, why can't he get a better venue?" And now, why are they losing partnerships? Wanchain gone, Factom gone. I know those are literal who's in the grand scheme, but if even literal who's can't find a use for this project, why would the big boys use it?
inb4 dr;ns, inb4 hur you're replying to a literal fud meme thread by a tripfag. The dream is dead, faggots.

I see a lot of red wojacks. I see a lot of pinnk wojacks. I see a seething green pepes. I see a lot of cope. But what I don't see, are the laughs. The smiles. Maybe... chainlink wasn't about the $1000 EOY, but the frens we made along the way. I view it as a comedy, honk, honk.

The golden LINK bullrun already happened, you just missed it.
The true redpill is that LINK could have made you rich if you bought the ICO or near after, when everyone had minimum 10k in his folio and LINK was under 20 cents

The $1000 EOY already happened metaphorically because everything else did a /30 why LINK did a x30. It was that: doing incredible ROI in a very harsh bear market.

>inb4 the tweet of some dude with $1 BTC
Bitcoin was worth 5 millions at best at this time, LINK real marketcap is 1.5 billions dollars (it's already an unicorn per VCs standards).

You're too late for it nulinkers, sorry, you can still make a x2 or x3 at best in the coming years if you buy now but we already sailed without you.