/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57296441
Hi. I am not sure who you are talking about, assuming this is me, thank you for supporting the weak. But I was a small aspiring smart-contract / game developer, without PhD nor funds to invest. I doubt KDA price went down because of the criticism of mine, rather Kadena team simply sold profiteering on their early investors. I have cPTSD so I don't read /biz/, narcissistic alligators are always on lookout to cram me back down in cycles of abuse with bold inversion attacks and ridiculously specious pseudo-affective manipulations, exploiting the fact I have no social skills, no drive for self-advocacy, no support network, etc. Unfortunately, they piggyback influential financial and cultural power structures, they know how to get away with machiavellianism. It's better to distance ourselves from them as much as possible, ignoring them as long as they have no interest in genuine kindness.

>>55401589
- Kadena LLC's short-term trading strategy is adversarial to builders invested in the platform assets. This implies leadership does not have faith into their own community. Unfortunately, such view can be supported by various reasons.
- Pact features a set of algebraic and cryptographic primitives which simplify smart-contract implementations. However it isn't high-level enough for safe development and interoperation of complex game theory structures, as the current approach to formal verification is applying bottom-up "band-aids" to issues, rather than ensuring top-down correctness. It is targeting a mutually self-conflicting domain where frameworks won't have enough freedom to adequately optimize performance or supported capabilities, while Pact itself won't be high-level enough to enable exponential technological growth. Although they are constantly improving and expanding supported constructs, this is not a final observation.
- Chainweb's scaling solution remains unproven in a "real world" environment. As explicitly disclosed by original creators, correctness can only be ensured by nodes who are aware of all chains, implying limitations on the decentralization side of the trilema.
- The computational structure of Pact isn't abstract enough for straightforward optimal reduction, but devs mentioned improvement on underlying representation as a long term goal.
- Community overlook the seriousness of harmful behaviors, such as incitement to suicide, covert intimidation practices, etc.
- Power dynamics within the community may negatively affect growth, especially from individuals who are entitled to a self-image associated with the societal success of a platform. Power-tripping moderators bully actors entertain significant work and/or alignment research, regardless of consequences to contributive potentials.
- A large chunk of the community support explicit trolls such as "MW", which is perplexing relative to the seriousness of financial contexts.

>>52426989
most projects are dumb in their own ways. if i'm critically talking about a given one, it just seems harsh without perspective or context. i don't really know anymore
>>52427598
n-not really comfy. exchange valuation is mostly artificial. there is no volume whatsoever. xcmies have no utility and are shilled by over-confident bullies who collectively deluded themselves in the "we are the only good people in crypto and everyone else is bad" fallacy, while making you pump some nth highly centralized tokenomics (they proud themselves in their bags >>52408153 >>52408892 ). the price floor mechanism tricks investors into a false sense of value, whereas collective psychological utility has been wiped out by sell wall, making limits obsolete with a price potentially going down a lot in upcoming bear market. not to mention it would actually be fine if kewin didn't made the same mistake twice >>52421691 but he boomer