/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>55332772
oh so you do remember this, right?
>Probably
source on that, chief?

>>54245740
ok, but companies HAVE reneged on their agreements in the past
I'm sorry but no matter how you try to spin it, this is how it translates to me, remember the enterprise abstraction layer coming in 2022?

>>53704440
>Oracle has openly said they are working with Chainlink directly, even Ian Keane confirmed it on twitter bros, he also appeared on SmartCon 0
like I said, this will end up exactly like every Chainlink crumb ends up, a total flop and radio silence afterwards
>We don't know but we hope
if you can't even conceive a viable path of adoption and you resort to blind hope and appeal to authority then you shouldn't be in a position to advise others, period
the old chainlink convos consisted of extensive discussions analyzing every minor detail, they weren't full of hopeless midwits shouting
>SIBOS 2017 GUISE WAGMI
there was actual technical discussion going on, you nufag pretenders don't even engage in discussions anymore, and that is all I'm asking for here
you claim accumulation is taking place? support it with evidence, a rangebound price action doesn't mean shit, especially when the entire alt market is trading at a similar range bound level
you claim SWIFT will somehow lead to the LINK token capturing value? then support your thesis with something other than pure conjecture
>>53704472
I salute you anon, you have mastered the art of spouting entire 1k character paragraphs without offering an ounce of substance, truly taken out of the kike pilpul playbook
to answer your irrelevant question, I want genuine discussion because I believe LINK has been placed on a huge pedestal on this board, and it doesn't deserve it
>but I wouldn't do that bro wtf!!
well, no two people are alike anon, welcome to the real world

>>22936494
>Didn’t the flannel for start ups man say that Q3 was still the plan?
Ribeiro, yes.
Ian Keane from Oracle too, see pic.

Such a shame that Sergey flaked.

>>22911618
>it will be Q3 2020

>>22910564
Ian Keane was the last point of contact between Oracle and Chainlink, and he said the integration was expected to happen in Q3.

>>19805693
>>19805768
Ian Keane has nothing to do with Oracle integrating Chainlink.
He says so himself in pic related, and that slide saying "Chainlink integration Q3" was made and presented by someone else.

Ian is a pretty senior figure at Oracle, but the Chainlink integration was a decision made much higher up than Ian.

>>19068654
>>19068689
You should listen to his presentation from earlier today.
Neither he nor Fernando actually had anything to do with Chainlink actually being integrated.
Keane heard about Chainlink during his crypto education, and he heard about it again within Oracle via the Fernando thing, but the integration itself was out of their hands. Pic related.

>>19061535
>>19061555
He added "I think".
He doesn't actually know how this went. Pic related.

>>19061582
Yes, any startup can sign up to be connected to blockchain via Chainlink.