/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>30107491
What was that? You lost your caretaker? Need mommy to hold your hand? Whatever ails you, let us know, because it is obvious that you are lost.

wrong pic

This is also 2 years ago, distribution is way better since

Nano is such a threat that you even mention it, and the miner shills come out of the woodwork to try and attack it. It is almost like these retards have not heard of the Streisand effect.

Imagine buying this centralized shitcoin instead of Nano. FTM's marketing strategy was literally posting on biz and claiming to do what nano does but better. Turns out the network is hosted on an AWS node and by adding additional nodes exponentially slows down the network. Absolutely shit tier tech.

>>19341851
better and more recent pic

>>19134199
cope harder, nano is more decentralized than BTC, and way more decentralized than BSV

Reminder that Nano is more decentralized than BTC (with a trajectory trending towards further decentralization, opposite that of BTC miners)

>>16703333
More decentralized than BTC actually, which is the real shitcoin. No buzzwords needed, NANO works now. It is the only cryptocurrency that has been proven to be able to handle the scaling problem. Those "buzzwords" are all there are too it. Simplicity is beautiful, and is how great complex structures are created. You just need a foot in the door when it comes to bringing something new and novel to the market, which NANO most certainly has. We do not even know the implications of what NANO is going to do to the world. It may very well change our entire concept of payments, likes, votes, wages, and integrated technology. NANO can do everything that DAG, FTM, IOTA, and BTC/BCH/BSV have claimed to do. And it is capable of doing it now.

https://www.kappture.co.uk/cryptocurrency.html#

>>9948408
think you got some time buddy. lots of whales in your coin