/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25836369

>>18684707
>Kim hacks into all global news feeds
>"Check 0x0 address"
>Whole world simultaneously gets on etherscan, before it collapses under the traffic humanity sees an outbound transfer of all burned tokens and misplaced ETH to Kim's personal wallet
>"Nukes will be launching in five minutes. Place your positions accordingly. Good luck"
>Signs off, every television screen on Earth goes to static

>>13834594
>he hasn't read Assassination Politics
You physically mail cryptographic keys containing your "bet."
>>13832371
You have it backwards, you would need to probably be required to wager 5-10% of the current pot to make a prediction. The idea being, someone would put up $10k on a $100k bounty for a specific date is probably reasonably sure of such.

>>7335024

You'll be sucking dick to make up for all your loses.

>>6203114
all of us.

FairX coming out this quarter

Go

>>3838085

Why is this shit coin mooning?

roll

Whales are buying this like crazy.

Who else held on to their bags?

OH SHIT IT'S HAPPENING

$3000 IN 30 MINUTES

So what's the safest course of action for the coming months guys?

Cash out everything?
Cash out initial investment plus a percentage of your gains?
Cash out initial investment but leave gains in exchanges to capitalize on any market movements?

or maybe seek refuge in assets you think are going to keep their value through the next months (BitGold, BitUSD, USDT, DigixDAO etc...)?

FOLDING COIN

>>1584873
the sour graping has already started

>>1488888
checked.


imagine how much shilling can be achieved with 500K, this shit is going to the fucking moon niggers.

>>1179138
GXY Is shit, This guy is a fucktard.

>>1157145

>>1146714
sell it for btc and convert BTC to cash.

But I recommend holding for another 6 months. you won't regret it.

>>1132629
ETH IS A SCAM

Where were you during the 2016 Ethereum Massacre?

This ride starts now.

http://www.wjh.harvard.edu/~dobbin/cv/workingpapers/Board_Diversity_and_Performance_07_01_10.pdf

>The overall pattern of findings across the several dozen studies that have been published to date tends to support the view that gender diversity inhibits performance.

>Taken together, these studies are consistent with the idea that firms that are having good runs are more likely to appoint women, but that once appointed, women have neutral or negative effects on performance.

new stock tip: when investing account for the 'anti-diversity' ratio, the more strait white males in executive positions, the more likely to beat the market.