/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29424302
>>29424304
>>29424808
>>29425158
newfags

>>29004248

>>27289983

this is an upsidedown 2017 bitcoin chart but the same applies if you use an upside down GME chart today

>>27051243
>>27049981

its like this except with the inverted GME chart instead of 2017 bitcoin

>>16831908
>Read the whitepaper
>a revolutionary new way of bag holding
>you hold these bags, we dump on you and you get more premined shittokens
>buy now!

lmao

If you hold Chainlink (or any other premined shittoken) and talk shit about XRP, you're only laughing at yourself.

Seriously, premined shittoken holders are as tech and economic savvy as retarded XRPtards. Maybe even more so, because at least XRP is it's own thing. Something like Chainlink is a shittoken on top of a complete shitcoin. It's twice as retarded.

Price has fallen but the average IQ never recovered.

No higher than 90 and I am being serious.
Evidence is all the retards who took online tests and think that it is real.

>see new shitcoin of the week being shilled on /biz/
>wonder "will this even work without chainlink"
Am I deluded or enlightened? Either way, browsing /biz/ seems so pointless.

Convince me that Bitcoin is going to go above $20k. It could not function at that price with that level of volume. Mempool was clogged for weeks and tx fees were in the $30s. As far as I can tell these problems have not been solved, block size is still artificially limited to 1mb and LN has been 18 months away from being ready for three years.
Bitcoin is 99% speculation, but speculation will eventually be limited by bad fundamentals, so I don't see Bitcoin ever surpassing $20k, perhaps never reaching it either. I'm retarded though, I don't really understand the fundamentals so tell me why I'm wrong and convince me otherwise.

>>11255976
nobody wants to go back to january levels. pajeets and normies spamming TRX and XVG threads every 5 seconds killed this board.

>>9124972
quite possibly yes

>>8081680

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ruHs0M0ZS30

good one pajeet

>>7531273
>scientific FACT

>>7268330
I've been eyeing it since December. Didn't pull the trigger because fuck shittrex and then it pumped. I'll probably pick up some eventually, though I'm not entirely convinced as to whether it's such a great investment, despite the project being seemingly legit as fuck. I have to get around to read the whitepaper someday, because at the moment I've no idea how the tokens are going to be utilized (network fees?).
>>7268399
pic related
>>7268417
True. To $1 mil it's $18/token for each, meaning LINK $6b cap and REQ $12b, which is less than a fucking scamcoin from china had.

>>7252442
The bubble has bursted.

>>7210587

>>7070126
>what is difficulty adjustment

>>7046730
>/biz/ is smart
imagine ACTUALLY believing this

>>7020196
>HODL
Go back to plebbit

>>6951697