/biz/ - Business & Finance

>Full day of selling off and no buying momentum
>Another day of the market pulling back after insane rallies from Tesla and Amazon
>WKHS somehow holding 16.00 near market close
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a long position. Workhorse is solid.

>>20108383
you shouldn't trust anything that you see in the media or here
all of these people are fearful and/or greedy, but mostly they are just dumb

If you try and become a day trader you will probably fail. but if you try to do other things you will probably fail at those too. So should you never try anything? No! just do the best you can. If you fail, it's because you deserve to fail.

~stocks~

>>16514553
>an average of 1% a day consistently from the stock market using TA in some way? or let's even say 0.5% a day consistently, on average
I think that is unrealistic
I want you to do your best, I want you to succeed, but the most important thing is to set realistic expectations

FRIDAY

>>15762891
yes that's what markets do...?
I already said that in my post :)

>>15762886
some of us have real jobs... even when a recession comes we'll still have a solid 40-50 hours/week salary job

>>15715402
>Did you invest in yucky bonds?
actually all I do is buy high quality equities
then they pay me
it's easier than you'd think

>>15715414
cute !
: )

>>15687582
you are like a little baby
I worked for pay all last night
then when I got home in the morning I fired up EU IV and put in hours more work cleansing the steppes
the danes tried to attack me in the baltics unexpectedly but I turned the tables on them
and basically, my net worth and income IRL just keeps getting higher

bout to sleep right now
hold down the stock market until I wake up

>>15256096
>simulate things over a long period is really retard

it depends on the simulation.
obviously some physics simulations, you can reliably approximate dynamical system kinematics over arbitrarily long time periods. others we have problems simulating extremely short time periods, because we don't know what happens
the rest of your post I can't even decipher, so I can't reply to it.

>>15256114
OK, I'll try and be more straightforward:
In your hypothetical game, is it:
1. there is a simulated market, with simulated order books and the "players" are the only ones that interact with those order books?
2. the market simulation states are "fixed" and based on external price histories, and players orders don't effect the book?
3. some other choice?

I'll explain the problems with simulating either of those if you want. #1 is the only game-like one, but it also has issues (fun issues) setting up a working market place. Most "rules" and initial conditions that you set up will lead to a very non-market looking situation later in the simulation. that's how these things usually run

>>14886221
no
no
>>14886236
but you have rich parents so it doesn't matter?
you can cry to someone else about how it all isn't fair, I'm not hearing it