/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>6379940
>most of these things could easily be done by private companies
Yeah and here you pull facts out of your ass. Sure it won’t be a problem until all disputes of Right of Way are are settled but you gotta finish that first
>doesn't allow private companies to build infrastructure in these areas because the state owns all of the roads/waterways or makes it illegal to open an airport etc
>heavily taxes, spends and regulates the economy so private companies can't do shit like this because it costs too much
I don’t think you’re mature enough to understand. Do you STILL not get the part of “government pays, private builds” that I’ve been trying to say over and over again?
>There are plenty of shithole countries with LOTS of infrastructure, but they have a shitty economy. I WONDER why that is?
>Hmmm, you're a drooling retard.
Golly gee, can’t wait to see you mention atleast one of them

As for Sweden, I don’t know, but Norway has always had high income taxes and high government spendings and yet you believe its success is limited to free market lmao
I do believe Switzerland is better, but listen here you fucking faggot: Switzerland works well because it has all the basic requirements to be a functional state: high living standard, best infrastructure in the world, decent foundation of market and is situated strategically between France, Italy and Germany
>You DON'T support free markets, you're just a berntard that wants free gibs and the government to change your diaper.
I support free markets in well developed countries that can be completely self sufficient. Just because I acknowledge poorfag countries need massive infrastructure spendings doesnt make me a fucking bernie “free healthcare and college and weed lmao” cuck
Whereas you believe MUH TREADING can never exist and will work absolutely anywhere regardless of current state and history because you read some shitposts on /pol/.
Literally a manchild

>MFW I wake up and check my blockfolio

>>5631924

Buy eth tanks senpai