/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>9443220
Yes, lightning transactions fail all the time, even coretards make fun of themselves for it. And yes, it's possible to hack segwit by simply forcing a hard fork between the segwit and non segwit sides of the softfork chain. Segwit nodes will not accept the transactions as valid and will fork off, pre segwit nodes will accept them as valid because to them they just look like anyone can spend transactions.
Further, the nature of LN as a second layer that holds custody of funds means that any vulnerabilities in that layer persist automatically over to the sabotaged primary layer.
In conclusion just more evidence you have no idea what's going on.

>>9429923

>lightning is a speeding bullet train
>When the bitcoin devs themselves mock its uselessness

Bitcoin cannot have another bullrun.

I'm seeing a lot of niggers making """Predictions"""" on when bitcoin will have another moonshot to 10k/14k/18k. It simply isn't possible. If Bitcoin were to go up again, the mem pool would fill, slowing volume via fees, leading to another crash. Bitcoin is stuck going sideways or bleeding out till triple digits. What exactly are you hoping for in terms of bitcoin? Do you think bitcoin will sustain itself on the transaction of *just* whales and not regular users with $1-1000? Why would such a currency work?

>>9344197

>if it works

>if it works