/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>29019217

Remember that the psychiatry industry today was invented mostly by orderlies in asylums who weren't happy with the amount of praise or status they received from giving out medications to patients (also Jews). Would the group who spends a large amount of time trying to pathologize any opposition to them as mental illness have an interest in creating a condition that paints anyone with the correct brain structure to put the pieces together as insane or "paranoid"?

I'm sure I could very easily be diagnosed as schizophrenic were I to actually speak truthfully to a psychiatrist. The thing that caused me to have this suspicion of the condition is that the things I was always told were paranoid delusions have been proven true one after the other. How many accepted views about the world need to be proven false before the default position regarding world events becomes suspicion and contrarianism? If somebody lies all the time, at which point does it become prudent to believe the opposite of what they tell you by default?

The people that decide who's a schizo and who isn't claim transgenderism and homosexuality aren't mental illnesses, while also claiming playing video games and being racist are. Schizophrenia has never been "proven" in the clinical sense. You can cut someone open and "prove" tumors exist. Schizophrenia is based solely on the opinion of a member of a group that has been shown over and over to not be working in the best interests of the patient. Cancer was discovered, mental illness was invented.

>>25681529