[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.52788482 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52788482

>>52788190
Apologies for calling you a disgusting liar, it was the first time I got mad at you. Since 5 minutes past already I'm fine, so you're just a normal liar, and here is why:

Total links: 20 (there were some in the same thread I tried to filter them but couldn't filter all so they ended up counted here)
Total jokes: 10
>Obvious jokes, using those posts as an argument makes you look silly
Total truths: 2
>There is nothing wrong with pointing out how lcx is a scam
Total not me: 3
>One of them was even as a reply to my post, werid how you made this mistake
Total what: 5
>Other, like using the nword not as a joke but as the default insult to people on this board is not racism
Total things I shouldn't have said:
>Nothing, there was one post where I made fun about a twitter account being delted, but the account was not deleted so I deleted the post. I put that into the what category.

You probably didn't think I would make the effort to check each, and if you want I will write literally an explanation to each in a big collage.
>you said dude out of disdain for any potential gender identity
Canadian government moment. This is not transphobia.

>> No.52441025 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52441025

>>52440978
I'm talking about the coin, not sure what the problem is. Did you know that most of the volume is fake? Funny
>>52440987
>always have to save face.
Isn't that what you're doing ITT by not replying to me pointing out how LCX is wash trading to make it seem like they have large volumes on their scam exchange?

>> No.28777298 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28777298

>>28776681
It wont happen. Too much is now depending on the stock market. From boomer pensions to shitty banks buying more and more stocks with QE money.

Unless they want to kill the US and have a revolution they literally can not allow the market to correct. But they also can not tighten money supply or the market crashes.

Welcome to the real doombull era. Where stocks go up forever. Till they don't and 90% will probably get caught with their pants down.

>> No.26722276 [DELETED]  [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26722276

>>26721967
OP is a big faggot.
Anime is based and cutepilled.

>> No.26524875 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider it.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
26524875

>>26524578
kys

>> No.20963487 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, 1596480037762.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20963487

you're all gonna make it bros, I believe in you.

>> No.20961235 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20961235

>MSFT 217
Remember to take profits lads.

>> No.20561670 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20561670

>>20561621
Im a cute Japanese 2D anime girl who is pure and smells nice.

>> No.20234137 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20234137

>>20234065
>Those are objective successes.
>Chink phones are smashing the competition in western countries.
>Chinese in big cities are now using mobile pay and they've adapted quicker than most developed countries.
How is this addressing any of the points I made?
Im not saying my Xiaomi phone doesnt exist, Im saying youre buying into a company that may be 20% fake or boom/be dismantled if the communist leadership feels like it. Or be banned from the NYSE if the Americans think thats funny.

Youre obviously Chinese so I wont stop you from buying into all of this, Im just saying you might wake up to a LK, not an AAPL.

>> No.20178308 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20178308

>>20178216
>>20178138
Ah ok.
Well, if you want you can buy a LEAP.
A "Poor mans covered call"

Buy a MSFT call strike 140 for Jan 15 2021. Cost 68,55.
Then sell covered calls against that.
Your risk here is that MSFT has a significant drop till Jan 15.

Never tried it because I have the money to buy 100 shares of whatever I like, but it sounds like a good strat.

>> No.19825172 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19825172

>>19825027
We will just crab from here. There is no reason to buy but also no reason to sell.

>> No.19761167 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19761167

>>19760972
> america lost vietnam and korea because for whatever reason they decided to just pull out...it's probably more complicated than that, but that's the plain fact. superior fire power and more troops results in a win. but they didn't want to fight total war.
Thats like saying the SU did not really lose the cold war because they could have nuked the whole world and gotten a draw.
Or saying North Korea didnt lose the Korean war because the Americans didnt occupy their whole nation.
Or saying the SU didnt get fisted in Afghanistan because they could, again, have nuked the whole place.

A war is based on objectives. You fulfill these objectives, you win, you do not, you lose.
The US' objective in Vietnam was to keep the commies out. They could not fulfill that, they lost.
The US objective in Korea was to hodl the line. They fulfilled that, they won. The commies tried to conquer it all, they could not, so they lost.

Americans LARPing that they somehow did not lose the Vietnam war is pathetic desu..

>> No.18287215 [View]
File: 183 KB, 700x500, consider the following.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
18287215

>>18287102
Maybe. I think so at least. If OP looks for a life long investment and just has 4k at hand right now I think it does not matter too much though.
He didnt buy the top of the bubble in February. Thats already good enough
>>18287116
>Buy a tech or a general SP500 ETF
I generally do not like this approach because I prefer to buy value and growth stocks by myself desu. I just want MSFT, BRK and AMZN, not KHC and Sears mixed into that package.
But if someone does know absolutely nothing about the stock market you are right of course.

>buy stocks of high dividend companies
Thats more dangerous if you have no idea. Many companies have high dividends because they have nothing else to prop up their stock price.
For a complete beginner it is more advisable to pick an ETF here to avoid stepping in a divvy trap company.

At least thats my opinion.

>With your approach hed be less diversified in the stock part
These big companies are already so diversified that you pretty much buy three whole industries if you buy AMZN. You buy online delivery, cloud computing, AI, consumer electronics, etc.
And BRK is practically an ETF in itself. Just better.

Just my two Cents. I do not think it matters too much desu.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]