/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>12496707
Thanks mate. You're right. I gotta prep myself to abort mission when that mood hits. It's what I'm the most afraid of. That I won't really have the metacognitive impetus to park myself when noticing I'm in such a mood. I guess I'll do some mental exercises to harden/prime myself to do the right thing when the time comes.
>>12496717
>>12496764
>>12496775
My gf is a rather unusual person psychologically in ways that make it not a big deal. We both have crypto portfolios and have been up and down and up again and talked a lot about it over the years, so I know she's chill.
We've been together for 6 years and both live pretty frugally and split shared expenses 50/50 via a joint account separated from our individual accounts. I help her invest her money separately in low-risk ways (non-crypto non-leverage) for the long term and she trusts my judgment. Even during temporary downturns of her portfolio, she hasn't shown even the slightest hint at resentment or nervousness about it.
I don't want to update her on my shorter term gains or losses with my own money though for obvious reasons. That emotional rollercoaster is best contained inside my head rather than becoming a thing that is injected into the relationship where I one day talk about how glad I am due to the gains and the next day I either talk about some loss in a depressing way or fail to talk about it and feel like I'm kind of lying by only mentioning when I win and being a poser.

Talking about gains/losses with the rest of my family or any friend is a big mistake indeed though. That's an invitation for the
>"how much money did you make today champ?"
meme

>>4943794
Vitaliks Argument is based on a flawed premise that is addressed in the blog.

>This doesn’t seem as ironclad as it sounds. It seems entirely possible that there would exist paths from you to _any_ possible recipient going through _any_ of your channels. Any sufficiently well-connected graph has this property.

>Any sufficiently well-connected graph has this property.

The problem is that the way LN works, people are disincentivized to open channels to many people due to two reasons.

1: You pay a transaction fee on main net when you open a channel, as you are locking your BTC into a BTC smart contract for LN. You lock BTC independently for each channel.

2: Channels to small BTC balance LN contracts are pointless to (pay to) connect to because the part of the transaction that goes through them can't be smaller than their balance.

Don't say someone was "BTFO" if you don't even understand the argument that supposedly BTFO someone.

>>4920436
>It is his project.
OK so tell me, what are the mechanics by which he has control of it?

Him saying "calling my projects names" isn't him saying "the project is mine I'm the king of it". And even if he did say that, which he didn't, he would be incorrect.

Can you really make money on this shit?...