/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>51662426
we might be bottoming

>>23054748
LINK or even QNT have bounced back up like a perky teenage ass for swing trading for me. Scams like Vechain or NEO seem to take a long time before chinks start taking evasive pumping action before it looks like the project about to fall off a cliff price wise

>>16945665
>>16945873
this is probably all you can handle

>>16089109

Obviously 2019 was good and 2018 wasn't kek

>>14827699
>As an investment, a bitcoin is no better than a woodpecker scalp or a Yap stone

Not true. Precious metals and Fiat are much closer to woodpecker scalps and Yap stones. Smart contracts are CONTRACTS. That means its an agreed upon contract for a deflationary asset. It has no outside influences because it is nothing more than a binding CONTRACT. The contract is trustless so nobody can fail to uphold their side of the CONTRACT.

A traditional stock can go belly up because the CEO died. Gold or silver are influenced by supply. Oil is influenced by supply as well. The moment someone figures out how to find a bunch of the shit it can cause the price to drop. Crypto on the other hand does not have these kinds of problems. The concept of a smart contract is the evolution of money weather you like it or not.

>>14217643
I guess I really dont understand why some boards get it and some dont. I feel like the pros outweigh any cons (I can think of none) as far as having flags on THIS board in particular. It seems like were catering to pajeets so they can spew their bullshit unchecked

Alright, if a crypto based game is not 100% on chain then its assumed the game will need dedicated servers to prevent people from cheating / Item duping ect. A trusted 3rd party basically. Trusted third parties suck and they make it pointless to have a game that even uses crypto. Trusted third parties also mean the game can die if its not profitable ect.

Fuck that. I want to avoid that shit as much as possible. So this leaves me in a situation where either a game is 100% on chain or its fucking shit basically. But this means games like first person shooters will never really be possible on crypto and that really sucks.

Unless, what about this...
> Smart contract requires encrypted codes that are hidden in the game client.
> If you don't know the codes/encryption you cant run the smart contract commands without properly playing the game.
> Encryption could be constantly changing so even if you do crack it you wont be able to cheat for very long.
> Loot is time gated anyway so even if someone does figure out how to cheat they wont be able to do much more than normal players anyway.

This could only work for PVE loot based games I think. The games profit model would involve a player driven economy where the dev takes a small cut of all player profits on the market for buying and selling items but is otherwise "free to play".

Is this shit possible or is it completely fucked?

>>11747489

>>11728506
Thanks fren

Post the brapper youre gonna fuck when you make it with link

>>11537071

>>11362118
I don’t speak incel wtf does hambeast mean

>>11327363
Pls pump NEO next sirs I trade brapps for dapps

any other neet has a fucked up sleep cycle?

i stay up 24h to sleep 18h

so 1 day lasts 42h in my life.

im afraid this cant be healthy over time?

>Last week, in an interview Elizabeth Stark (CEO of Lightning Labs) reminded everyone that this is "very early days" for the Lightning Network, she compared it's current stage to where the Internet was in the 1960's when it was the Darpa Network. She's saying we should be measuring in decades, while Charlies is saying months.

part 7

>>11276554
Here we go thanks bro! I trade on the 4H but will pick my entires on the 15m I think becusse if my indicators, GOOD ADVICE DUDE. Btw my pos is up 15%