/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>14614295
>why would anyone want to cut admin costs by 90% using this technology?
>you

Upvoted. Orange man bad.

>>12675296
> Muh technology
T. the late adopter speculative ideal

>>12670505
>beep boop

>>11734552
Buying an experimental token in an experimental new piece of financial technology from a bro writing code in Britain? Yea, the (((SEC))) totally has the resources and more importantly the motivation to go after some NEETs because they bought some internet funny money no one understands. How many people do you think they need to assign to their crack (((SEC))) team to match american IPs to linkpool owner addresses? Lol

Quit being faggots biz. That’s to (rightly) protect Jonny, but not buying because you’re scared of the government regulating a never before seen tech? When did they rule linkpool passed the Howey test? I bet no one in the SEC even knows about linkpool, so let’s keep it that way by not having Jewish americans continuing to ask the dumbest fucking obvious questions and peeing their pants regarding linkpool.
>you forgot to collect our homework teacher!
555-come-on-now.jpg

I sold all my LINK it will surely dump and I will buy back in cheaper

>>11334562
>don’t be anti Semitic goy

>>11320924
>Chainlink is a fucking JOKE!!! None of its "fans" even take it seriously. You all pray to frogs and numbers with wild eoy fantasy predictions. It's never going to gain any real adoption. A better more professional company will beat them to it.