[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/biz/ - Business & Finance

Search:


View post   

>> No.54759049 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
54759049

>>54757022
>BTCers getting nervous

>> No.52914474 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
52914474

>>52914471
https://btcparser.com/1/?d=202111
A fuckton of Satoshi Era coins started moving on the 10th. They moved the BTC, later the BCH, but kept the BSV (BSV may have moved weeks later I can't confirm atm but I recall it).
Now, when we talk Satoshi Era coins the chance for them being Satoshi is super fucking high, as Bitcoin either didn't have a price or a very low one (under $0.1, https://time.com/nextadvisor/investing/cryptocurrency/bitcoin-price-history/ ), so given SN would have had set up big servers when everyone else was running off their sh*tty laptops he would have won most blocks. These coins were all mined before Nov 2010.

!!! 40 (fourty!) SN Era blocks moved between the 10th and the 12th. And they moved 20 a time at the same fucking time!!!

Now what's the chance that 20 different SN Era block winners moved all these coins at the same time on two occasions just when CSW had testified in Court, shouted "coins will move!", and kept only the BSV, but not the BTC or BCH? Near fucking 0. It's one entity who moved this shit:

It was Satoshi Nakamoto, even if you don't believe that it's Craig.

So there you have it. This is your chance for a financial opportunity of a lifetime. Don't waste it, don't become a people hating retard, but don't become Trudeau either fuck that nigger.

>> No.51726524 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51726524

>>51725283
It could be anyone, really.

>> No.51666632 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
51666632

>>51666316
No. In most cases the owner does have the key, but not in all. Besides, he did have it.

>> No.50927170 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50927170

>>50926555
Checked. Kek knows.

>> No.50918330 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50918330

>>50914444
Checked and Truth pilled.

>> No.50522698 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50522698

>>50518317
>>50519233
>>50519356
>>50519520
>>50519784
>>50519955
>>50520143
>>50520155
>>50520203
>>50520239
Geez who will I believe, a raging 4chan incel or the actual successor of SN?

>> No.50460851 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50460851

>>50460710
>actually burn the corn by sending it to an invalid script
True

>he talked about it, but i only know lawsuits against twitter people and bitcoin devs.
Well if (You) don't know, I guess it doesn't exist?
https://www.ontier.digital/post/bitcoin-creator-launches-ip-claims-against-digital-currency-exchanges
https://coingeek.com/craig-wright-accuses-coinbase-kraken-of-passing-off-fake-bitcoin-in-lawsuit-worth-hundreds-of-billions-of-pounds/

>> No.50430443 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50430443

>>50429851
>And eventually shorts run out of coins to borrow. Unless there is naked shorting going on. Any indication of that?
DESU I doubt it.
Sure there's shorting going on, but look at the simple availability of BSV: It's not on Coinbase or Binance, which means it's really hard to buy and it is in comparison. Not being on those platforms also loses you trust, which is a little ironic, as they mostly are scammers listing any shittoken to benefit from fees then delist it later. Also, look around in any BSV thread, most people really don't believe CSW could possibly be SN. They are so set you can post them an entire list of clues and they will ignore it or somehow reason it away. Finally, not being BTC just makes most people think it's trash like Bitcoin gold or diamond or other meme versions, so they don't give it time of the day to begin with.

Take picrel: Gavin unironically said this under Oath. He is the DIRECT successor of SN. Somehow people don't believe him, and instead believe... Vitalik who after 7 years couldn't scale Eth. And they believe BTC maxis where 14 years into the project BTC cannot possibly support global payments. Yet BSV is basically almost there after just going back to the basic system, how it was described in the whitepaper for the most part. Peer to peer and big blocks. Simple. They can't see the forest for the trees.

>> No.50397567 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50397567

The actual SN successor saying it under oath must be a psyop.

>> No.50376474 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50376474

A russian pedo or the actual successor of Satoshi Nakamoto?

>> No.50195620 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50195620

>>50195443
Very serious. Some of my research is listed here:
>>50195550

TLDR:
- all crypto price action is heavily manpulated
- Vast majority of projects are scams or other form of criminal activity
- BTC cucked by small cockers & Lightning doesn't work
- ETH not needed as Bitcoin (BSV) was always Turing Complete (ie smart contracts etc)
- CSW is SN

>> No.50152252 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50152252

>>50148899
>how does it do it?
Fairly simple: As the original implementation intended you use bigger blocks. Satoshi thought it was so straightforward he even just posted a small post ala "if block #x increase size by y". Originally we had a limit of maybe 16 or 32MB, so either way BTC is wrong with it's 2-4 that in practise are usually 1.5MB only.

Core Devs can't see the forst for the trees.

Here's a riddle:

Blocktime is FIXED to ~10min intervals for security reasons. What are the 2 methods to improve transaction throughput?

>> No.50085229 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
50085229

>>50085162
>He's betting an entire country's future on it, so why aren't you with your future?
Because I did my homework, unlike him and the Rocket Scientist Saylor.

>> No.49451433 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49451433

>>49451401
>no keys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dC0wwFJ7cHM

Soon my sweet summer child. First we establish enough legal lawsuit precedent. Maybe already have, but waiting on appeals.

Picrel Gavin under Oath now (:

>> No.49403806 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49403806

>>49403761
>t. random twitter twat #473830

>>49403745
again...
- Answer to perjury & fake Wayback Machine post
youtu.be/OqpwuJw7cxY?t=2614

>> No.49333187 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49333187

>>49333120
Basically just think of it as either replacing BTC+ETH or going to 0. So if you think owning 2.1 BTC right now is a lot, then 2.1 BSV is also a lot and at the very least a great hedge.

>> No.49268883 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, 1648904744939.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
49268883

>>49268653
Idk... I mean it's obviously possible, but these type of responses have been coming not only for months but years, while the BSV price underperforms, so I can't really conclude accumulation FUD from this. I'm sure there are some cunts doing it tho, especially the Arabs who've been hosting CSW recently

>> No.29991742 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29991742

>>29991484
You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin BTC?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>> No.29983150 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29983150

>>29983045
He did sign the genesis key. Just not for you.
You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin BTC?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>> No.29451961 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29451961

>>29450860
You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin ?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>> No.29316976 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29316976

You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin ?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>> No.29310892 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
29310892

You may not like Craig Wright, but he signed with Satoshi’s keys to Gavin Andresen with a freshly unboxed laptop and did similar signings for Jon Matonis, Ian Grigg, Stefan Matthews and Calvin Ayre - none of which would be easy to fool, and none of which have retracted their claims.
The direct successor of Satoshi Nakamoto as lead developer on the Bitcoin project was Gavin Andresen.
Gavin Andersen explicitly said that Craig Wright signed a message using the private key from Block #1 of Bitcoin. Time was spent on a careful cryptographic verification of messages signed with keys that only Satoshi should possess.
So who do we trust? A 4chan anon or the lead developer of Bitcoin ?
https://youtu.be/gTPcm4zCJIg?t=6

>> No.28628049 [View]
File: 45 KB, 1280x591, Gavin Andersen.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
28628049

3 Days
If just the short positions in BSV are closed and not ONE BSV is purchased
It will go up 450%

84% of BSV is shorted. Doesn't that seem odd to a rational mind ?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]