/biz/ - Business & Finance

I never felt so good buying a dip as I did filling my bags again at $1.37

Those of us that have the vision and can see where this is all going are truly blessed with a 2nd chance at buying Bitcoin under $5

It's here. Bitcoin 2.0: Digital Oil Boogaloo

>>20522626
good to know thanks fellow RLChad.I'm beyond excited to see everything they release about v5 on the 30th man.
It's just all so cash money. It's like looking directly into the face of the future.

>>20460878
BASED REAL LIFE CHAD WITH REAL LARGE COCK

>>20460933
CHKKED

>>20460955
FUCK YOUR TRADING YOU JEW YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE MESASGE

>>20460990
INDEED. IEXEC RLC WILL BE THE FIRST COIN TO GO OVER A 1BTC EVALUATION.
IT IS KNOWN.
DATA AND COMPUTATIONS WILL BE THE MOST VALUABLE COMMODITY IN THE FUTURE

>>20212657
September too. I assume it'll cool down in August (unless, and hopefully they have more announcements), but it could be 3 months or more of pure gains not accounting for when the market goes "oh shit this coin is valuable" and picks some up, only to realize "holy shit there's almost no supply left on exchanges" and then the price skyrockets into the hundreds of dollars.

>>14829507
SINCE FOREVER

>>14442360

Imagine link is just deepbrain bitconneeeect brought to you by Sergey Prakesh undercover
Muhh memenet
Murlockrackle
Muhh UrL urine link marine
Banana
Muuuuug soon delisting even from mtgox

Right Oywin

>>13274890
As far as I know, LINK doesn't have a product, mainnet, release date, or confirmation that decentralized oracles can't be attacked by sybil attacks. So LINK does nothing right now. Back to your shitting street.

Imagine timing one of the most important releases with the golden bullrun.
What an absolute chad.

>>13186789
>Tokenomics
Has stacking and is open to changes in the future.

>Hyped up partnerships.
First some insiders know about it. Then they post it here and everybody calls it fake and discord group P&D. Then news gets released on Intel, IBM and soon Alibaba Cloud and fudders call it "hyped" partnerships. Ok retards

>No adoption.
So? 100% of crypto has no adoption. This retard Probably owns some shitty overvalued +1b market cap with 99,99% volume on exchanges and not actually in usage and calls a 30m project "moonboys".

>Replaced by ETH
If it's so easy why don't you do it? You'd be a millionare in a few months.

So yeah, when FUD is that low, you know it's a good project.

>>13184344

https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2018/10/30/a-new-trusted-compute-api-for-ethereum-blockchain-solutions

https://www.ibm.com/blogs/bluemix/2018/11/iexec-integrates-ibm-cloud-to-increase-the-security-of-decentralized-computing/

https://news.ubisoft.com/en-us/article/345175/Ubisoft-Startup-Program-to-Focus-on-Blockchain-and-AI-in-Third-Season

https://medium.com/iex-ec/iexec-moves-forward-collaboration-with-intel-and-alibaba-cloud-at-rsa-conference-2019-ccc1f119f2ae (this one doesn't confirm it but team said Alibaba Cloud will publish an article of the partnership soon).

BTFO pajeet

>>13145402
Weak fud, try again.

>>13110762

>>13072890
>Transact RLC and executes any task of cost
Meaning, someone buys RLC, and trades it to a worker for any digital OR real world physical task. How is the real world task possible? Look at the iExec powered SLAM robot. PoCo algorithm allows for real world tasks to be verified and trustworthy.

>reduces costs of your company
Pretty self explanatory. Instead of your company needing to put down upfront costs in hardware/buildings/employees/maintenance costs/whatever upfront costs, they can simply utilize the decentralized iExec market for what they need done. Even large corporations will find use here as it's a perfect hedge against their own physical investments.

>Player gains 1 life
After buying enough RLC, you go from being a shitlord wagecuck retard to an absolute iExechad cyberpunk god. Your life changes dramatically once you realize you've already made it by buying below 1$.

>Scales your shitcoin of choice
RLC will enable shitcoins to scale up massively by offloading onto RLC's decentralized computation marketplace. Remember when ETH was struggling to use even 1 dApp? Cryptokitties? Yeah, well if RLC was usable during that time it could've made that whole debacle never occur. RLC can handle an infinite amount of computations, and will thus be the backbone of any coin that struggles to scale. The proof of contribution algorithm is the heart and soul of this capability.

>>12990133
Ahead of what? Golem is a rendercoin, it's only purpose is to serve as payments for rendering tasks. That's it. I can't even find the fucking roadmap on their website, I guess there isn't any.

iExec is a decentralized cloud computing network. I can compute anything you want. It validates every task and has a reputation and staking system. And I'm not even talking about team and partnerships which destroys Golem.

So what exactly is Golem ahead? Does it have a validation system? How does the network know workers aren't cheating and not doing any computing? Which partnerships does it have? What's their future plans? If you can't answer that then go back to your shitting street.

>>12960366
Yeah that thing used by CERn to distribute computations.

You expect a literally who project with no partners and team with poor background to compete with a project with IBM and Intel as partners, connections with all major companies in the industry, and team that worked for Intel, INRIA and IBM.

Well done Ranjesh

>>12858370
>A booth at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona. Biggest mobile congress in threworld. Most new mobile models and other shit are presented each year there.

>A booth inside Intel's bigger booth. With Intel logo stamped all over iExec's stuff.

>Showcasing the future of robotics and self driving automation for smartcities.

This is one of the few oportunities in life to become rich as fuck. And you're laughting at it. Good luck being poor.

>>12806427
It's mentioned on a pajeet scam comparison table. Your rendercoing will eventually be a dapp in iExec marketplace. Stop being so close minded and research what iExec can do.

Market cap means nothing in this inmature market. There's literal scams on top 10 market cap. Time and market maturity will put everyone on their place. iExec has done 0 marketing to normies, they are chasing big fish as Jullien said (and they already fished some of them). Golem has spend much more effort marketing to normies, but has no important partnership.

Be deluded all you want. iExec aims to decentralized computing. Golem to rendering. Rendering is just a small part of everything iExec is going to be capable of.

Was writing a reply and got closed.

>>12798381

You linkies maximalist disgust me. You're so deluded to think your "still no product" project is going to moon on mainet and go to 1000$ because Sergay is our lord savior and is gonna make us neets filthy rich. I own LINK, I think its a good project, but you retards are making me want to sell them all, I refuse to share the same community with you, you're all cocksucking eachother thinking you're the chosen ones and your project makes everything obsolete. Stop it. It's cringy.

>Thinks iExec will be run by pajeets
Meanwhile iExec closing deals with multibillion companies

>Pay slightly lower amount
Because you say so? Are you fucking retarded? All idle computing power in the world can join iExec for computations. Do you think pools are going to sell at same price than AWS? Do you even think, bro? Let that sink in before answering, Sergay and autist anon neets are fogging your mind.

>Thinks AWS can scale with the demand that's going to come in the next 10 years.
Have you even done 5 minutes of research? Do you really think AWS can scale to infinity and provide a competitive price? 500 cloud billion industry in 2021. 2 trillion industry in 2030? Who knows. But the future is cloud computing and AWS cant scale forever.

>Fog computing
How is AWS going to deliver fog computing? Are they going to build a CPD every kilometer? Oh yeah I forgot, Ranjesh donest even know what fog computing is.

Stop with your LINK cringe shit, it's making me (and sure other anons aswell) dislike the project. Every retarded link shill feels like fud now.

>>12770006
Weakest fud in a long time
>Biz shilled this token
Ok? It's been one of the less shilled on /biz/. What about literally scams like BTSV, Verge, etc?

>One of the worst volume on Binance
At they don't pay market makers and washtrade for fake volume scams.

>Approximately 0 comunication
They release 2 or 3 tweets a week, make around 1 article a week, and they have an open slack community that you can talk with all team members everyday.

>How this shit will not be delisted from Binance ?

Cause is a legit project that's going to change the internet as we know it.

>How this shit will not go to 0 ?
Keep buying scams Ranjesh. All you retards will regret once this starts getting adoption.

>>12726562
>Taps card

>>12698755
It does need a token. Proof of contribution algorithm uses it and iExec's entire heart and soul is based on that algorithm.

Try again.

>Taps card

Linky maximalist are so pathetic they think (((their))) coin can do anything and beat any competitor. Delusional idiots. I hold LINK and RLC for maximum /comfy/ levels, there's nothing wrong i doing so, they're not competitors.