/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>58305119
remember this guy? holy shit I can't believe I'm actually already feeling nostalgic over these shitcos and those godawful threads.

>>23829864
Who knows anon... Im waiting with baited breath hoping it will so I can buy more.

>>23794831
whaaaaaaaaaa
Why would you even care about a loan at this point? It was the best possible move, no share dilution, and its easily paid back in a year of production. I just do not understand why some people look at taking out a loan as horrible when the only other alternative is dilution, especially when its a loan that is the last part they needed for production.

Their share price has not even been properly revalued yet, if you can get it at 1$cad +/- 10c I would if I were you.

>>23755345
aurcana is over a buck for me now... it was 68c when I started this ride... CAD
Flipped it two times so far at about 93 cents and bought back in lower...

not doing that this time, full hold mode, acquire more if it dips.

>>23742575
get the us version of aurcana before it cracks 1$

No reason why they wont be 20-40% of first majestic share price next year

>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE 50k still hasnt transferred into broker
>Aurcana almost completely back up to where it was pre crash

FUCKKKKKKK

>>23685620
Just doing my job citizen!

>>23441440
forgot to mention dilution is very likely for BHS


News today for other miners:

Good news today, aurcana got a loan to finish opening ouray, very good news for them, that seems like it was the last major thing between them and restarting production. No dilution forthcoming from them.
https://ceo.ca/@nasdaq/aurcana-announces-receipt-of-credit-approval-for-us28m

>silver up 1.65%
>WHY HAVNT MY MINERS MOONED!?!?!?

meanwhile almost all my miners are up 2-3%, some are up 9-15%, one or two are down 2-3%...

You guys need to be patient... miners do not track PM prices 1-1


Picked up another 3k aurcana on the dip today, doubt Ill get more at 78 c unless a huge crash happens again, would be happy too though.

>>23395420
yeah 8-10 cents is a fair price for BHS right now.

sucks to have bought at 17 but what can you do?

My problem right now is the stonks I have, I want more of, but they are no longer cheapies :(

>>23343972
anon... i personally have sent aurcana more then 5$ for every poster on PMG

>>23344063
I wouldnt look too much into it... the canadian mint had a lot of issues with milk spotting too. I cant recall right now if it was the blanks or some treatment in the process, but its not uncommon.

>>23314159
Did someone call?!

>>23218276
>sees things up 5-10%
>thinks he has missed out on 1-100X run ups

whew lad.... throw some in now, and do monthly buys, while saving some for a dips

>>23166352
would much rather see a stack picture, then have a financial dick measuring contest.

>>23166441
hmmm never heard of this guy, why should I listen to him?

Aside from him being a fellow aurcana investor?

>>22870621
well lets come back in 6 months and see who did better i guess.

to be frank, your insistence that a small company which is currently losing money will outperform a mid sized one which is making money, based solely on the leverage to silver, makes me less likely to buy impact then before we chatted.

Impact at 30/oz to produce, even assuming they ramp up production to 1 mill oz a year, and silver goes to 100/oz, only makes 70 million bux, which also assumes you dont take the mark down from selling concentrate like they do.

FM at 8 per oz to produce, maintaining actual production of just under 14 million oz, with silver at 100/oz makes almost 1.3 billion bux...and its refined bars at the end which garner more $.


I wont break down aurcanas #'s because they havnt made production in a while, they are a purely speculative play, albeit one I think will pay off bigly.

Sincerely hope impact does well, but when you talk about dilution of aurcana, but not impact when impact doubled their shares in a few years recently, I am of the opinion its because you are selectively reading into them. I am confident they will see an increase during the bull run just as much as any other miner, but probably not as good as the ones I have chosen to invest in.

We will see though, best of luck

PS also aurcana has a bitching super hero

does impact have a super hero?

>>22819347
hurts more that I dont have some $$ to buy up the cheapies with then it does that my shares at 16$ went to 13$

At least that $ went to aurcanna and 100 oz

annnn aurcana is back up to over 90 cents, hope you all got in while you could.

UP UP AND AWAYYYYYYY

>>22748803
just doing my duty, up up and awayyyyyy

>>22535406
People were saying these exact same things to me when I was shilling aurcana

>>22528438
Aurcanaman told me $40 silver + production should = around $6, maybe higher, probably by summer '21

>>22499079
nice miners bro, I have 4 of those and might buy GOLD

>>22482333
you are welcome, but I doubt i was the only shill. I sold at .98 cad a share, and I am def going to re establish a position if they go back down.

Fucking hard to say no to 30% gains, always hard to think they might moon without me, but I do expect a pull back as they went up pretty fast with no news, I dont think ill see 70 ish cents any time soon, if they hit anything in the 70's or low 80's im throwing as much as I can at them

>>22371569
did you bang on the door and ask how their financing is going?

>>22360428
My job here is done

UP UP AND AWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY