/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57501973
do you own a timemachine?

Need some help.
My staked linkies are in a ledger and connected it by metamask on a firefox.
Tried to migrate but it says something about missing u2f extension, and even with that turned to true it still doesnt work. Ledgers website says that it no more supports newer firefox versions. It suggests using chrome instead. Im little nervous about importing metamask to a new browser. Are there things that i should be especially cautious about?
Did anyone else have similiar problems?

$12.65 today

kek wills it

>>54263323
intredastin. Thanks for explainin.

Kek is here

Another experiment demonstrated that the SWIFT infrastructure combines asset tokenization platforms and different types of cash payments. With Citi, Clearstream, Northern Trust, and SETL, SWIFT explored 70 scenarios that replicate the market mechanisms for issuing and transferring tokenized bonds, equities, and cash in the secondary market.
Successful experiments have shown that different distributed ledger networks can be combined. SWIFT’s experiments address the issue of interoperability between different CBDCs and tokenized assets. Moreover, they can be used in the existing financial infrastructure, opening up opportunities for their gradual integration into the international financial ecosystem. The development of SWIFT capabilities in this context will facilitate investment and trade interaction using CBDCs and tokens between more than 200 jurisdictions.
SWIFT’s experiments with CBDCs moved into an active phase at the end of this May. More recently, it became known that SWIFT and Chainlink are working on the possibility of combining traditional and cryptocurrency assets.

Kino thread.

LMAOOOOOOOOO

>>51485660
Or show the real view behind Chainlink?

>>50788542
>implying that is hard to reach

>>50667944
>>50668007

>>49970283
>So this is going to backfire like all the other sanctions, right?
yea
sure

>>49767147
2011 newfag here
although I entered /biz/ and crypto only in 2018
just in time for LINK, went all in and never looked back
it is what it is

>>49733907
Reminds me of this one

>>49565434
They aren’t going to buy until they actually need to use the token for accessing Chainlink services.
Big publicly traded companies can’t just buy a ton of Link tokens right now because they’re already getting killed on their stock prices and other investments.
Crypto is seen as one of the riskiest places to put money, and these companies don’t want anything risky on their balance sheets right now.

Once they start using Chainlink services, someone will walk them through buying and using the link tokens as part of the process and not some way to invest.
Link is a utility token and isn’t meant to be held.
Those that do hold it will end up profiting massively because there’s a limited supply and demand is about to go crazy when cryptographic truth gets more and more important.

>>49540281
There’s so much link that was bought at $3-$4 that it would take a nuclear winter to break that level.
I’m pretty sure it’ll test those levels, but just like when it almost hit $5, it’ll stop short.

Set your buys at $4 and $3.50, and you’ll have made the buy of a lifetime.

>>49510401
Chainlink pumps on performance, not news or rumors.
Once staking starts rolling out and locking up supply along with CCIP increasing demand, then the price is going to go batshit insane.

If you want a speculation ridden shit coin, literally pick any other crypto

Describe your life after you will quit your job thanks to staking.

>hold chainlink since 2018
>want to die everyday

are those two correlated?

sell and buy more

just pump already please...

VOLUME IS DANGEROUSLY LOW

WHAT WILL HAPPEN?????????? WHATS THE TARGET?