/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>11847400
I'm not making shit up, don't think I didn't see the trick you pulled, taking the "load on one node in the network with costs paid by the operator" and extending it out to "load across the entire network with costs subsidized by a block limit so economically useless nodes can still keep up". That's why you need to kill yourself. Because it's that kind of dishonesty that has the ecosystem in the place it is. You flat out fucking lied about the load on the network of increased transactions and tried to obfuscate the truth by altering the perspective of what was being discussed, as well as upon whom the burden of the processing of those costs should be placed. So once again, go fuck yourself.
And yeah, the same market forces that caused the BCH split, the split that proved your neckbeard idols and your dishonest coterie in general were talking out of their ass about the impossibility of exceeding the 1mb limit. The market is better than you, it trends towards optimal solutions, which you most assuredly do not fucking have.

>>9497318
Where have you *been* the past nine months?
To explain;
Core made stupid decisions on their chain, miners fought them vigorously without success for over three years, segwit2x compromise was reached, but miners forked the chain before the activation of segwit so when the transparently obvious failure of segwit2x happened, they would have a contingency plan to go with.
Now there are two different chains sharing the total hashing power, and 90% of miners have empirically demonstrated that they will follow profitability. Each chain has a difficulty adjustment algorithm (DAA) that operates differently, and the BTC DAA will result in chain death if BTC loses hash power to BCH at a relatively low rate (about 7% per day), but BCH has no such vulnerability.
So to sum up in a short analogy; basically the miners are now reluctantly working for a boss they think is completely batshit insane only because he pays them well, whilst running a side hustle superior to their shitty bosses old business in every way, knowing that eventually the customers will come to that business in greater number than the old business, at which point, they will quit and the old bosses business will die.

>>9339666
Ahhh Medieval Peasant Haircut Man. That guy is so emblematic of the clueless fucks who blindly follow core without having the slightest idea what's actually going on.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BWvKMu7OYV4

>>9143944
> you provided no evidence for your claims
Because they require none, everyone knows it's true and it's ridiculously easy to verify, but since you're pretending to be unaware of it, and for the benefit of actually new lurkers that might doubt it and be interested;
1) BTC adoption and dominance has been falling for some time pic related, this very clearly correlates with the times of high transaction volume that makes it clear the core sabotage has made the product flatly unfit for use pic related
2) segwit adoption has been falling and is at about 30% http://segwit.party/charts/
3) The chain is barely being used at the moment. https://jochen-hoenicke.de/queue/#1,2w
Your claims on the other hand were flat out false.
You're a slimy lying cunt.

>>9132078
Kill yourself dumb cunt. You'd be doing the world a favor.