/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>57468961
-0.68%
acceptable

>>56624473
>you dont know what it feels being so close yet so far away
i am worth $830,000
only about $250,000 of that is liquid
i don't care.

>>56480561
bishop e3, check.

>>53650918
uranium

>>52364568
i like the pink guy threads better. please use him when sharing your private cope session with us. thank you.

>>51144296
uranium up but silex down, as i predicted. very fascinating company, but continue to wait. they have not replied to any emails from me yet, which is not encouraging.

>>51036970
hey how many people did i have to explain to that preferreds dilute the common?
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3875377-wall-street-goes-ape-but-not-in-a-good-way-for-amc-as-its-ape-shares-set-to-debut
i think it was... all of you? just wondering

>>50951643
uranium kings
abandon peninsula energy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dF_LuGAS1BI
this is all kinds of mediocre news

>>50608817
>be me
>inhale
BOY
it's designed to do one thing only, decay
stop fighting it, behave in accordance with this
expend your mental efforts on theorizing elsewhere: with the creation of a small business, or research a business in an area you know something about
then when it rockets up for 2 days, short it over 3 months

>>50608802
kek

>>50608873
nice, thanks. i have been posting gold-vs-sp.jpg and i'm saving this as better-gold-vs-sp.jpg

>>50502854
because yield is a function of the price and it's coupon, and the price of a bond can and does change even after it's issued at par.
take a look at https://www.ustreasuryyieldcurve.com/ to visualize the "curve" drawn by taking maturity/duration on the x-axis, and yield on the y-axis. immediately discard this URL as this site is never up to date with the correct figures, and also, they call the series "interest rate" which is imprecise.
you can get the correct data, up to date, from bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/us
so what you can see here is that if you go out and buy a secondary-market UST today, while you should expect a higher yield if you lock up your money for a longer duration, you can actually just get a 2Y and hold it to maturity and it will yield 3.03% for you. that's the highest yield of any of them.

>>50233050
markets don't like a 75bps hike right now today, but an entire day is a lifetime for a market that can quote equities every 5 minutes.
economies running 8-10% inflation don't even fucking feel it. one thought to the next thought for a trillion-dollar economy is six months long.

>>50073358
1. value is subjective, people impute value to things
2. no, but i explained why it would become a fad, made six figures off of that fad and paid off my house, and subsequently have explained how next it will become worthless
3. n/a
>correctly
you have autism, so it's important to understand that your hopes and desires, your ideas, the information you have collected, won't stop you from losing all of your money in crypto. every last penny.

>>49904484
the concept isn't broken, people just believe in the wrong definition because they choose to be ignorant.
in my opinion, it stems from a deep hatred of god. it has to, because gold is part of the natural order, of the structure of the universe -- chemistry is a descendant of, and not far removed from, physics. and they simply won't accept that all of this was created, deliberately.
economic behavior that has internalized the truth that gold is money, and which runs downstream from this truth, is favored by god. all other economic behavior is of a base political nature, and it is hated by god, and those who participate willingly and believe the lies of these systems, are punished in kind. but with these truths, even those who would not have the rule of man, and political economy, can suffer it, and succeed, because they are better informed than even the game-makers at the playing of their own game.

>>49857409
yep. been telling you all week. it's musical chairs.
crypto to crypto to crypto to crypto to crypto to crypto to poverty

>>49818279
i mined until i think 2013 then paid $900 or so after that, rather than commit like $8k for TH mining equipment. this turned out to be the better decision for only a very short while, so i should have gone for the equipment instead, but i didn't reailze it would blow up into that big of a fad in 2017. i sold the top tick and never looked back.
fads are capable of killing absolutely anything, no matter how good. as it turns out though, ten years later, no good has actually come. nobody has quietly advanced blockchain technology in any meaningful way. it's interesting but ultimately does not have real utility, and i think the reason for this is because it requires distributing the ledger and forcing all counterparties to agree and all that.
this simply is not consistent with how money works. this is a credit system, and credit is useful, but credit is ultimately best held in the hands of investment banks, ideally the free-market kind but literally even the US FRS is better than crypto is. truly a disappointment but i'm old enough to know when to let something go and move on.
in the time bitcoin has been collapsing, i've realized 3x gains on oil and am stacking REITs, a smidge of US tech, and transitioning into EU assets. eurozone gridlock will inhibit their ability to wreck their markets for the forseeable future. nothing is in the way of the US right now, we will skid right past them off the road and ride the dirt shoulder for a while.

>>49799882
if it even makes it that far. i can't see how it would get there with what we have on the horizon. even if i'm wrong, the fed will be coming to rescue equities, not crypto. nobody's going to start pouring their paychecks and their stimulus into this shit.