/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>27058892
WSB tourist here, this jew thing is starting to make sense

>>24628875
I never found discord to be favorable until I used it. I provided my email in my older threads and received lots of positive feedback, however using my email to go over subjects and explain whatever was at hand was cumbersome, if you have a better alternative besides threads on /biz/, I'd like to hear it. You can go over my older threads through warosu if you don't find what I'm going over legitimate or if you find it to be similar to a reddit post.

haaaaay

where are my MPLS faggots at with the L2.5 shim?

>>20151063
Tulips are not scarce, they are not fungible, transferable, divisible, but please faggot. tell me about this insightful analogy.

@ Everyone

Going to bed now, I'll make another thread soon. Thank you.

>>18976491
I'll make a throwaway email for you, and regarding payment, you're very kind but I can't accept your money, I'd find much more satisfaction in just helping you do what you want to do. I'll make it shortly and send you a reply with it. I appreciate the interest, most of the information that you'd like to access is available online, but regarding questions you can't seem to find, I'll be happy to answer. As well as directing you to information that would be beneficial.

>>18960127

Regarding your first question(s), I'm primarily an options seller (and by that I mean almost in every aspect) since they have an advantage over options buyers in pretty much every instance, which is some I can link for you here

> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1aw6SEdpUQ&t=1330s

IV plays a huge factor regarding the security I'm going to be trading, and even more so the type of spread (Condor, Credit, Strangle, Straddle, etc) It's well known that higher IV levels regarding a security will benefit an option seller more than an option buyer based off of IV overstatement, as well as the fact that a security with an already high IV value has a much higher probability of lowering in value than increasing in value, since it already having a high IV value is an oddity and on the lower side of probability, in simpler terms, since It's already high, it makes more sense for it to fall in value, than to raise. And since my methodology regards option selling, the contracts that I sell (which have a high IV value) will devalue, which credits my account when I buy back the contract at a lower premium than which I had sold it

Regarding other data, measurements of all the Greeks help tremendously, though there hard to grasp at first, they become quite simple since they all relate to one another. It's all about putting probability on your side. Delta is my main concern since it contains a value similar to something created by the think or swim platform such as Prob.ITM which both give you a realistic measurement of the probability of the contract you are looking at selling/buying expiring ITM (something you as an option seller do not wish to happen.)

Think or Swim regarding where I actually trade, as well I have spreadsheets referencing the correct spread to use at certain IV levels to leverage probability. There's more of course, not that it's all "necessary."

>>17558695
yeah what does it tell us? high volatility? its just a pnd?

>>16543789
This is not a crypto board and I'm not going to entertain the idea / argue that since if you read the description actually explaining what /biz/ subjects should cover, you'd understand. As well, if all the threads here are regarding crypto and in essence pointless post's with no subject matter or worth, there's room for my threads and threads like /SMG/ (which isn't crypto related). If you want more crypto information, please go to another thread.

>>16485743
1. That's relative to the premiums pricing and if it's a neutral trade to begin with. By neutral I'm referring to simple pricing calculations such as Credit received being =/+ Strike width x Prob.ITM. As well as other Greeks and IV and a few other aspects with my methodology. I'm a probability trader so my answer is only applicable to the strategy's I adhere to. To answer your question, It's really up to my interpretation as I'm viewing the contracts available, relative to the time till expiry. Definitely more than 5, It's all relative though. I do trade monthly's more than weekly's.

2. This is something you develop on your own, but a fair return is relative to what you're risking, and the amount of contracts / position size. 15-20+ is a fair return, but again, it's how you're interpreting that trade and gauging risk.

3. Being an options seller is always more profitable than being an options buyer, this is fact. I sell options almost in entirety, but that's of course relative to your methodology. You have to find a strategy that works for you and do as such, regardless of debit/credit spreads. I'd recommend to trade for credit and use decay aspects to your advantage

4. I did trade with a full time job, I did paper trading as well before hand (which everyone should do before trading). And yes there is a transitioning phase (at least in my methodology) where my probability averages out as it should along increases in position sizes. To the point where I am receiving enough to where I don't need to work regarding just expenses. This is a concept already explained online many a times, it's just finding methods that work are hard. Regarding actual $ amounts they were larger figures $25-40,000. Not that you need larger figures to be profitable.

5. You will become profitable if you stick to your strategy and back test it. I'm happy I can help in any way, appreciate you coming to the thread.

>>16475079
I could give a simple price setup regarding IV and Delta and proper pricing, but the "logic" behind the trade is really something you have to just understand by familiarization with options. anyways...

XYZ

Vertical / Sell: June 16 495 Call / .34 Delta / 31.10% Prob.ITM
buy : June 16 500 Call

Credit : $1.65

$1.65 Should be equal to or greater than :

Spread width x Prob.ITM (31.10%) ~ 30% = 1.50 < 1.65

This spread without any adjustment based off of probability is already a winning trade, though adjustment
/ Laddering to eliminate downside and bank profits early is the real key to growing an account.

There are also a few more aspects involving picking a security that I have not just mentioned such as IV being analyzed.

>>16453200
Learn how trade option spreads, and encompass the language and methodology. As well, learn about probability trading with options using greeks like Delta/ "POP"

>>15083473
did someone say treat?
0x0F31f205c2C8bDdD1a6f15Cf04aC67CC8394A67e

>>14586890
>and if you need a friend, get a dog
https://youtu.be/-TLCaDbBv_s

>>14509082
I wouldn't go with his books and wouldn't recommend them to people
However, his UofT lectures that are posted on youtube for Maps of Meaning are informative and useful

>>14509086
>Can you please fuck off with your schizo-posting
>t. discord doxxer
tell your butt buddies I'm coming for them

>>14403243
>good G0Y by day
>bad G0y by night

>>14379857
>around this time part of the earth will be absolutely rekt?
I'm not as pessimistic as most here
I most definitely was at one point
I'm still skeptical but not pessimistic anymore
change is coming, in a fucking huge way, and we're going to be alright actually
I suspect (((they))) invented bitcoin to break the spell that (((money))) had on people and to lift us out of (((debt))) and (((usury)))
people started to forget the forest for the trees, but they will be reminded
and it will be glorious
the masses of people aren't as stupid as they make them out to be on the talmudvision

>>14365789
>What's the 42 pill?
>>14365876
>Turbo autism

>>14320260

>>14286685
>Oh wait, you'll hide and cry
the proof will be in the pudding
what exactly are we wagering again?
that btc eats up liquidity in the crypto market when it rises?
everyone knows that
when granpda bitcoin starts walking, the other coins gets choked out
it isn't some kind of mystery, everyone knows this, everyone except for you apparently

Sell everything for link

>>14228345
>seriously dude? a movie title?
>>14229478
>listen, "42"

seriously DUDE, a concern troll?

>>14227611