/biz/ - Business & Finance

>>25857094
deleted the first one to make the second one slightly more epin, but still missed a grammatical error because it's late and i'm a retard (should be "especially not *IN* immutable, globally-distributed fintech")
even assuming that the US government COULD or WOULD try to ban one or all cryptos for any reason, they're not the only government in the world (nor are all the current governments in the world the *only* governments that can or will ever exist on earth)—though, granted, they are the government claiming authority over a great number of highly capable people
blockchain changes things from the ground-up; gives anyone from a pawn to a megacorp the ability to make or earn an asset backed by the value of the work being performed on its network
from the moment the bitcoin source code went public, the concept of involuntarily-funded governance was definitively placed in a scenario wherein the only feasible outcomes are ones in which they've lost control; it's now the twelfth year of development in the blockchain space, and there are millions of nodes for developed blockchains globally
there are hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people across the planet who can code blockchain
voluntarists see blockchain as a tool for liberation in that it makes their actions and speech immutable, and thus favor blockchain; involuntarists (being fundamentally self-destructive) see blockchain as a means of furthering their control over society, and thus favor blockchain
both parties see the value in trustless, guaranteed outcomes
what i'm getting at is that without even touching upon how money printing itself incentivizes high-value people's moving away from fiat in the first place, you have SO MANY things securing blockchain investment and usage

this is a pretty long-winded brainlet writeup but i'm fucking wiped; i have no natural obligation to try to convince you of anything anyway, so take it or leave it

ps fuck you for calling me a retard only i can do that

>>20536232
"throwing biz under the bus"? dude, i want cheap link too
at this point, chainlink price action is completely irrelevant other than for buying more link; /biz/ understands this better than any other place online
simeon threw HIMSELF under the bus in trying to make profits for himself, but only wound up giving us even more time to buy relatively cheap
i mean, my post is just my guess; /biz/ has ALWAYS fudshilled link, almost since its inception
some anons here seem to be genuine with their fudding; it's a pity that there are some who really don't get it, but what can you do

teehee