[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   
File: 246 KB, 1200x1200, 1609271160450.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
796256 No.796256[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Hey guys, since I saw a guy's patreon (oscarkim123) I have been wondering if it was legal to profit off NSFW animations that use other people's models. Do you have any idea if this is the case?

>> No.796257

>>796256
yes
people rip shit and make their own adjustments.
Why so you think theres a fuckton of overwatch porn and those fags get away with it

>> No.796258

>>796257
That's pretty cool. So if you make a model and publish it online, even if you say not to use it for nsfw stuff, you really can't do anything about it?

>> No.796259

It's not legal, but nobody seems to have received a cease & desist yet.

>> No.796264

Blizzard sent some cease and desists over people making porn with their models, but I haven't heard of anyone actually ending up in court over it.

There is a legal risk to doing this, but it appears to be quite small thus far.

>> No.796269

>>796264
I guess it can only work if you live in the same country. Gl getting some third world shitter to stop desecrating your models

>> No.796275

not sure if you faggots are all american or why you make such a big fuss about copyright enforcment (I'm not advocating for ripping). like blizzard would care and do much about some animated overwatch hag, when people literally steal their online games, host their own servers and live comfortably from P2W shops and donations. Just google Warmane WoW or Ascenion WoW if you dont believe me. and you can always disguise your patreon comission work or whatever as something else where the actual coom product is just a bonus. like a discord member role with special benefits that just happens to have the ability to "request" 1 coom vid. like try to make big money first, worry about the rest later

>> No.796327

>>796256
>if it was legal to profit off NSFW animations that use other people's models
You just described Daz """artists"""

>> No.796331
File: 183 KB, 395x358, 1594406357621.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
796331

>>796327
Daz ""artists"" don't usually animate. But they have permission to do what they do.

It's not the same as, say, making an NSFW short of Elsa. This is obviously an example, it doesn't have to be Elsa, or even anything from Disney. But imagine if it were Elsa. Hm.