[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/3/ - 3DCG

View post   
File: 14 KB, 540x511, 1575640198117.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718410 No.718410 [Reply] [Original]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=966dwHnO7xo

wtf lads, you told me blender wasn't better than the industry standart tools.

wtf

>> No.718416
File: 643 KB, 1022x731, 1561164928786.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718416

>>718410

86$

Nice free open source program you got there lol.

>> No.718418

>>718416
that's a reasonable price for a plugin, you see people selling plugins that do much less for flagship creative packages that are $300+

>> No.718426
File: 65 KB, 343x174, frog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718426

Have you looked at the upload date?
They literally can't get it to work with 2.8.

>> No.718444

>>718418
you fuckin' blendlets are a real riot

>> No.718461

>>718426
the BF will redo all that who knows where, they have been working on a new retopo viewport shader and they have the PolyBuild thing now
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QarEhgsbJwQ

>> No.718481

>>718444
I don't even use blender, but I see zbrush artists selling brushes for $100 on their gumroads and there are reviews and purchases

>> No.718482

>>718418
>that's a reasonable price for a plugin
If $86 is reasonable for a plugin, then what is $250 for Maya?

>> No.718502
File: 35 KB, 630x630, 1552741285186.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718502

>>718410
Soul: Topogun
Soulless: blender plugins

>> No.718503

>imagine actually paying for this
i guess a consoomer brain can't comprehend the gpl license when it has paid for software all its life.

https://github.com/CGCookie/retopoflow

>> No.718504

>>718503
>>718416

>> No.718505
File: 108 KB, 400x381, 1520543750463.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718505

>>718416
>>718504
you can literally download their github repo for free retards.

>> No.718514

>>718505
thats what i was saying you illiterate frog

>> No.718528

>>718410
Anyone know what the music is?

>> No.718549
File: 413 KB, 2116x920, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718549

>>718416
Lets start a company. We have limited capitol and need software for 10 people. We could use any of these options.

or for 860 one time cost outfit the company with blender and retopoflow or whatever other plugins are needed. Or just use Git and get it free.

>>718482
Where the fuck are you seeing maya for 250? Its 198 a month from adobe per license

>> No.718551

>>718549
maya indie you stupid fucker

>> No.718552
File: 6 KB, 571x135, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
718552

>>718551
Per year cock sleeve

>> No.718560

>>718552
I can make that in 2 hours

>> No.718562

>>718549

What does the company do. Zbrush is perpetual and you can even get a subscription for a few months to do a contract and wait to buy it latter.

>> No.718564

>>718549
So you can afford 10 people, but not the software? Yeah, that business is going down in a couple of months.

>> No.718565

>>718549
$860 one time cost per seat is dirt cheap. You understand you have to pay people's salaries right? Chicken tendies isn't going to cut it.

>> No.718569

>>718418
cope

>> No.718585

>>718410
That's nothing new, 3d-coat had all those retopology tools for years

>> No.718641

Does everything have to be one or another?

Can't I think that Blender will probably never become industry Standard because it doesn't fit any particular pipeline role that I can tell, doesn't have customer support, and and the erratic nature of open source development means it's a poor fit with a risk adverse industry, and STILL think it's a very promising software with a lot of potential that's great for hobbyists and artists, and expect it to be very dominant in freelance work?

>> No.718760 [DELETED] 

>>718418
You know that Blender uses the GPL license, which forces addon creators to give you their source code for free, if you ask? Many even have a GitHub where you can get the stuff, zip it and use it.

>> No.718761

>>718426
Look at their GitHub, there is a working branch for 2.8.

>> No.718777

I've tested an older version on 2.79 and it was unusable because it was too buggy.
Couldn't finish the retopo job and went back to Maya.
When their 2.8 version is actually usable then we could talk about it - so far, there is unfulfilled potential, nothing else.

>> No.718782

>>718418
so you need costly plugins to make this shitty free app halfway usable?

>> No.718786

>>718782
OY VEY, DELET THIS

>> No.718792

>>718782
Just to make Blender the fabled actually usable, powerful and fast modeling machine the fanboys always tell you about you need to spend $150-200 on plugins. And that's talking about modeling only.
Of course, you can pirate the plugins, but at this point you're doing wonders of mental gymnastics just to not use professional proprietary software.