Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

Support us on Patreon!

/3/ - 3DCG


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 486 KB, 1280x720, Radeon-ProRender-Images-for-SIGGRAPH-2017-Cinema-4D.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
693431 No.693431 [Reply] [Original]

trying to get pic related to work on Debian Buster + blender 2.8, having issues because of the newer kernel, i think (it's targeted at ubuntu 16.04).
I have a Rx 580, it's pretty good with cycles, but i guess amd's stuff would work better with a ryzen+radeon combo.
Is it any good?

>> No.693437

>AMD

hope you an hero

>> No.693443

>>693431
It's the only GPU renderer at the moment besides Cycles which works on an AMD GPU so... meh? See if it's any better, but I'd personally wait for Octane.

>> No.693739

>>693443
Why is octane so popular? I have an rx 580 and and prorender works well for me.

>> No.693754 [DELETED] 

>>693437
You're a fucking retard brainwashed by corporations to the point that you have to dont see that people use hardware to make stuff and not to form some weird "loyalty" to a faceless company, like you have.

>> No.693755

>>693437
You're a fucking retard brainwashed by corporations to the point that you dont see that people use hardware to make stuff and not to form some weird "loyalty" to a faceless company, like you have.

>> No.693798

I haven't used it for a few versions, I found prorender better for archvis and products than cycles but was a little behind in features for characters with skin and hair.

>> No.693850

>>693431
Install windows 10.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action