/3/ - 3DCG

>>758466
rothko's probably worth even more.. his works are basically a cheat sheet for numerous artist working with colors and composition in a trillion$ industry.
Now you're blurring the line between culture and art (the latter is also the former, but not the other way around).
Your example of scandalous micheangelo's work is the case of art getting rejected by culture, no different with this thread OP furry art getting so much hate precisely because it's culturally inappropriate. That dick sucking piece of garbage on the other hand is an art on its own albeit made poorly, but if the intent is to desecrate other's work (despite that dragon is also a piece of unfinished crap), then it's a pop culture at best or worse if the intent is to simply draws controversy, then its political edgelord commie shit like ai weiwei's "muh destroyz" which is a meme, not art. Funny that when it come to those kind of stuff, it matter's most on who did it, why? because it is popular culture
(just realized.. a desecrated art is a meme, just like ecce homo)

>tl;dr art = creative endeavor, any form of subversion is cultural, or worse, religious&political.